Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 201, July 2018, Pages 40-48
American Heart Journal

Clinical Investigation
Treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure impacts cardiac remodeling: Insights from the CAT-HF Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.026Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including central and obstructive sleep apnea, is a marker of poor prognosis in heart failure (HF) and may worsen cardiac dysfunction over time. Treatment of SDB with adaptive servoventilation (ASV) may reverse pathologic cardiac remodeling in HF patients.

Methods

The Cardiovascular Improvements with Minute Ventilation-targeted Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy in Heart Failure (CAT-HF) trial randomized patients with acute decompensated HF and confirmed SDB to either optimal medical therapy (OMT) or treatment with ASV and OMT. Patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved EF (HFpEF) were included. Echocardiograms, performed at baseline and 6 months, assessed cardiac size and function and evaluated cardiac remodeling over time. The CAT-HF trial was stopped early in response to the SERVE-HF trial, which found increased mortality among HFrEF patients with central sleep apnea treated with ASV.

Results

Of the 126 patients enrolled prior to trial cessation, 95 had both baseline and 6-month echocardiograms (77 HFrEF and 18 HFpEF). Among HFrEF patients, both treatment arms demonstrated a significant increase in EF: +4.3% in the ASV group (.0004) and +4.6% in OMT alone (P = .007) and a significant decrease in LV end-systolic volume index: −9.4 mL/m2 in the ASV group (P = .01) and −8.6 mL/m2 in OMT alone (P = .003). Reductions in left atrial (LA) volume and E/e’ were greater in the ASV arm, whereas patients receiving OMT alone demonstrated more improvement in right ventricular function. HFpEF patients treated with ASV also had a decrease in LA size that was greater than those receiving OMT alone. Although there were significant intragroup changes within the ASV + OMT and OMT-alone groups, there were no significant intergroup differences at 6 months.

Conclusions

Significant reverse LV remodeling was seen among HFrEF patients with SDB regardless of treatment allocation. Substantial reductions in LA volume among HFrEF and HFpEF patients receiving ASV suggest that ASV treatment may also improve diastolic function and warrant further investigation.

Section snippets

Study design and patient selection

The study design of the CAT-HF trial has been previously published.17 Briefly, CAT-HF was a multicenter trial that randomized patients with acute decompensated heart failure and confirmed SDB to either treatment with ASV and optimal medical therapy (OMT) or OMT alone. SDB classification and severity were evaluated using a type 3 cardiorespiratory polygraphy test with a respiratory effort sensor signal that classified patients as having either central or obstructive sleep apnea (ApneaLink Plus,

Results

Over 18 months, 126 heart failure patients were enrolled in the CAT-HF trial. Of these, 102 had HFrEF and 24 patients had HFpEF. Analyses of cardiac remodeling in HFrEF and HFpEF were analyzed separately. Among HFrEF patients, 52 were randomized to receive ASV + OMT, and 50 received OMT alone. Within these treatment groups, 40 patients in the ASV + OMT arm and 37 patients in the OMT-alone arm had paired baseline and 6-month echocardiograms that were adequate for quantitative analysis (Figure 1).

Discussion

In this study, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of cardiac remodeling in a multicenter trial of heart failure and SDB in which patients were randomized to treatment with ASV and OMT or OMT alone. Among HFrEF patients, we found that substantial reverse LV remodeling occurred over 6 months regardless of treatment allocation. However, compared with patients receiving OMT alone, the HFrEF patients treated with ASV + OMT had a greater reduction in E/e’ and indexed LA volume, suggesting that

Conclusions

In conclusion, HFrEF patients with SDB demonstrated substantial reverse cardiac remodeling during the CAT-HF trial. Specifically, EF increased and LV volumes decreased significantly irrespective of whether patients were treated with ASV + OMT or OMT alone. However compared with OMT alone, both HFrEF and HFpEF patients receiving ASV + OMT therapy had greater reductions in LA volumes, which suggest that ASV therapy may impact diastolic function and warrant further investigation given the scarcity

References (33)

Cited by (16)

  • Diagnostic and therapeutic approach of central sleep apnea in heart failure – the role of adaptive servo-ventilation. A statement of the Portuguese society of pulmonology and the Portuguese sleep association

    2023, Pulmonology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nevertheless, it allowed to conclude that significant reverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling was observed among HFrEF patients with SDB, regardless of treatment allocation. Substantial reductions in left atrial volume among HFrEF and HFpEF patients receiving SV suggests that SV treatment may also improve diastolic function and warrant further investigation.16 A proof-of-concept study showed that treatment of sleep apnoea with SV leads to reduction in atrial fibrillation burden compared with OMT alone, without an increase in ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) events.

  • The effect of obstructive sleep apnea on readmissions and atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

    2019, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    With the compounded increase in morbidity as a consequence of OSA and atrial fibrillation, such patients are likely vulnerable to readmission. Studies examining the effects of OSA on normal physiology have linked it to adverse cardiac remodeling [36–38], which likely explains the predisposition to atrial fibrillation and worse outcomes. Such studies have also established the benefits of CPAP treatment in facilitating reverse remodeling and decreasing recurrences of atrial fibrillation [36–38].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Larry A. Allen, MD, MHS, served as guest editor for this article.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953874

Funding sources: The CAT-HF Trial was funded by ResMed Corp.

Relationships with Industry: Duke Clinical Research Institute was the recipient of research grants from ResMed Corp. M. Daubert has received research support from ResMed Corp. D. Whellan has received consulting fees and research support from ResMed Corp. H. Woehrle was employed by ResMed and has received consulting fees and research support from ResMed Corp. K. Anstrom has received research support from ResMed Corp. J. Lindenfeld has received consulting fees and research support from ResMed Corp. A. Blase is employed by ResMed. A. Benjafield is employed by ResMed. M. Fiuzat has received consulting fees and research support from ResMed Corp. O. Oldenburg has received consulting fees and research support from ResMed Corp. C. O'Connor has received consulting fees and research support from ResMed Corp. The other authors report no relevant relationships with industry to disclose.

View full text