Clinical InvestigationCerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions from 2002 to 2014: Incidence, outcomes, and associated variables
Section snippets
Methods
The present study is an observational, retrospective single-center analysis evaluating the incidence and the outcomes of periprocedural CVA and TIA related to PCI. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI at the Washington Hospital Center between January 2002 and June 2015 and with in-hospital neurologic outcomes available were included. Patients who received intravenous thrombolytic therapy were excluded from the analysis. The subjects who experienced CVA or TIA during or immediately after PCI were
Population characteristics
From January 2002 to June 2015, there were 25,626 patients with information available regarding CVA or TIA post-PCI and not receiving intravenous thrombolytics, who were included in this present study. The mean age was 65.0 ± 12.4 years, 65.2% were male, and 28.6% were African American. Overall, 110 patients had postprocedural CVA or TIA (0.43%) including 86 CVAs (0.34%) and 24 TIAs (0.09%). The incidence of CVA or TIA post-PCI remained constant from 2002 to 2015 (Figure 1) (P = .94), with an
Discussion
The present study describes several notable findings. First, the rate of post-PCI CVA or TIA in unselected patients was 0.42% ± 0.12%; this risk was stable from 2002 to 2015, despite the fact that most risk factors for stroke have increased in prevalence over the same time frame. Second, patients who experienced post-PCI CVA or TIA are more frequently African American and more frequently have a reduced LVEF and history of prior stroke, chronic renal insufficiency, and insulin-dependent
Conclusion
The incidence of post-PCI CVA and TIA is low and remained stable over the last 12 years, despite a steady increase in most risk factors for stroke. The outcomes of such patients remain abysmal, however, despite advances in the overall safety and efficacy of PCI. Further research is required to facilitate earlier diagnosis of CVA, and the relative utility of thrombolytics versus mechanical thrombectomy remains largely unexplored. Lastly, the increase in CVA among patients requiring an IABP and
References (19)
- et al.
Temporal trends in percutaneous coronary intervention–associated acute cerebrovascular accident (from the 1998 to 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database)
Am J Cardiol
(2014) - et al.
Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2004) - et al.
Procedural factors associated with percutaneous coronary intervention–related ischemic stroke
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
(2012) - et al.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2). The clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention performed without pre-procedural aspirin
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2013) - et al.
Hemorrhagic stroke the first 30 days after an acute myocardial infarction: incidence, time trends and predictors of risk
Int J Cardiol
(2014) - et al.
The safety and efficacy of thrombolysis for strokes after cardiac catheterization
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications
Circulation
(2002) - et al.
Incidence and clinical impact of stroke complicating percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Euro heart survey percutaneous coronary interventions registry
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
(2013) - et al.
Incidence and risk factors of cerebrovascular events following cardiac catheterization
J Am Heart Assoc
(2013)
Cited by (7)
Adverse Impact of Peri-Procedural Stroke in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
2022, American Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :In addition, patients with PPS more often presented with higher acuity illnesses such as STEMI, cardiogenic shock, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These findings have been observed in earlier studies9,11,13 including the Washington-based cohort study by Didier et al20 (2002 to 2015), which reported increased PPS among those who presented with acute MI and cardiogenic shock. In our previous study, we found that PPS was largely driven by unstable clinical presentation such as STEMI, out-of-hospital arrest, and need for inotropic support when compared with out-patient (non-PCI related) stroke, which was principally driven by age and chronic disease.8
Impact of Prior Cerebrovascular Disease on Decision-Making and Outcomes for Left Main Revascularization: Does it Really Matter?
2018, JACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsJCS/JSCVS 2018 Guideline on Revascularization of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
2022, Circulation JournalExpert consensus on simultaneous revascularization of carotid artery and coronary artery
2020, Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular DiseasesIncidence and risk factors for stroke following percutaneous coronary intervention
2020, International Journal of Stroke