American Heart Journal
Volume 160, Issue 2 , Pages e15-e16 , August 2010

Response to the letter regarding the article “Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents”

References 

  1. Li YJ, Rha SW, Chen KY, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Am Heart J 159:684-690.e1.
  2. Spaulding C, Henry P, Teiger E, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1093–1104
  3. Kastrati A, Dibra A, Spaulding C, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2706–2713
  4. Menichelli M, Parma A, Pucci E, et al. Randomized trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SESAMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1924–1930
  5. Valgimigli M, Campo G, Arcozzi C, et al. Two-year clinical follow-up after sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation assisted by systematic glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor infusion in patients with myocardial infarction: results from the STRATEGY study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:138–145

PII: S0002-8703(10)00444-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.003

American Heart Journal
Volume 160, Issue 2 , Pages e15-e16 , August 2010