American Heart Journal
Volume 160, Issue 2 , Pages 224-229, August 2010

The new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay improves risk assessment in acute coronary syndromes

  • Bertil Lindahl, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, University of Uppsala, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Bertil Lindahl, MD, PhD, Uppsala Clinical Research center, University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • ,
  • Per Venge, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
  • ,
  • Stefan James, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, University of Uppsala, Sweden

Received 14 March 2010; accepted 6 May 2010.

Background

Cardiac troponins are currently the markers of choice for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and risk assessment in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). With the introduction of the new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay, it has become possible to measure cTnT even in healthy subjects. However, how the hs-cTnT assay compares with the old cTnT assay for risk assessment in ACS is still unknown.

Methods

Cardiac troponin T levels were measured with the new hs-cTnT assay and the old third-generation cTnT assay in serum samples collected 48 hours after randomization in 1,452 randomly selected ACS patients enrolled in the GUSTO-IV trial. During 30 days of follow-up, deaths and myocardial infarctions were recorded. At 12 months, only all-cause mortality was collected.

Results

The 16% of the patients that had levels higher than the 99th percentile cutoff for hs-cTnT but less than for cTnT had a similar 1-year mortality as the 60% that were positive for both assays (9.2% vs 10.7%, P = .52) and a higher 1-year mortality compared with the 24% that were negative for both assays (9.2% vs 2.6%, P = .001). For death or acute myocardial infarction at 30 days, the group that was positive only for hs-cTnT had an intermediate risk compared with the groups negative or positive for both assays (2.4%, 5.2%, and 8.7%; P < .001).

Conclusion

The new hs-cTnT assay, compared with the old cTnT assay, identified more patients with myocardial damage and who were at an increased risk for new cardiac events.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(10)00429-1

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.023

Refers to erratum:

American Heart Journal
Volume 160, Issue 2 , Pages 224-229, August 2010