American Heart Journal
Volume 159, Issue 3 , Pages 399-405, March 2010

Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: A study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification

  • Harold Smulyan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Harold Smulyan, MD, Upstate Medical University, Department of Medicine–Cardiology Division, 90 Presidential Plaza, Syracuse, NY 13208.
  • ,
  • Ratnakar Mukherjee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, MD
  • ,
  • Paul R. Sheehe, ScD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Michel E. Safar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Centre de Diagnostique et de Therapeutique, Hopital Hotel Dieu, Paris, France

Received 29 September 2009; accepted 14 December 2009.

Background

Central aortic systolic blood pressures (SBPs) differ from and are preferable to cuff pressures when calculating cardiac work, left ventricular wall stress, and rate-pressure product. Despite the widespread use of dobutamine, differences between aortic and brachial SBP (pulse amplification) and pulse transmission during dobutamine infusion have not been previously studied. This study assessed these differences and used applanated radial pulses with the Sphygmocor (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) device to investigate the effects of dobutamine on arterial pulse transmission and pulse amplification.

Methods

Using a cuff oscillometer, brachial arterial pressures were measured simultaneously with directly recorded aortic pressures at rest and during increasing dobutamine infusion rates in 25 patients. In 15 of those patients, applanated radial pulses were fed into the Sphygmocor device and calibrated in 2 ways to predict aortic pressures.

Results

At peak dobutamine infusion, SBP amplification averaged 14.9 mm Hg, with a maximum difference of 43 mm Hg. When radial artery pulses were calibrated using cuff pressures, the Sphygmocor underestimated the aortic SBP at all dobutamine doses. However, when radial artery pulses were calibrated using the more accurate aortic mean and diastolic BPs, the Sphygmocor accurately predicted the aortic SBP at baseline, but not at the higher dobutamine doses.

Conclusions

Similar to exercise, dobutamine induced cuff SBPs and pulse pressures higher than those measured in the aorta—uncorrected by the cuff-calibrated Sphygmocor. This increasing pulse amplification was explained by the effects of dobutamine on the properties of the conduit arterial walls, on changes in pulse wave velocity, on increasing heart rate, and on reflected waves.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(09)00964-8

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.010

American Heart Journal
Volume 159, Issue 3 , Pages 399-405, March 2010