American Heart Journal
Volume 159, Issue 2 , Pages 264-270, February 2010

Biventricular pacing improves cardiac function and prevents further left atrial remodeling in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation

  • Michael V. Orlov, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Caritas St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Michael V. Orlov, MD, PhD, Caritas St Elizabeth's Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02135.
    • ,
  • Julius M. Gardin, MD

      Affiliations

    • St John Medical Center, Detroit, MI
    • ,
  • Mara Slawsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • BayState Medical Center, Springfield, MA
    • ,
  • Renee L. Bess, BS, RDCS, RVT

      Affiliations

    • St John Medical Center, Detroit, MI
    • ,
  • Gerald Cohen, MD

      Affiliations

    • St John Medical Center, Detroit, MI
    • ,
  • William Bailey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Lake Charles Memorial Hospital, Lake Charles, LA
    • ,
  • Vance Plumb, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
    • ,
  • Horst Flathmann, PhD

      Affiliations

    • BIOTRONIK, Inc, Lake Oswego, OR
    • ,
  • Katerina de Metz, MS

      Affiliations

    • BIOTRONIK, Inc, Lake Oswego, OR

Received 1 July 2009; accepted 12 November 2009.

Background

Randomized trials have demonstrated benefits of biventricular (BiV) pacing in patients with advanced heart failure, intraventricular conduction delay, and atrial fibrillation (AF) postatrioventricular (AV) node ablation. The AV Node Ablation with CLS and CRT Pacing Therapies for Treatment of AF trial (AVAIL CLS/CRT) was designed to demonstrate superiority of BiV pacing in patients with AF after AV node ablation, to evaluate its effects on cardiac structure and function, and to investigate additional benefits of Closed Loop Stimulation® (CLS) (BIOTRONIK, Berlin, Germany).

Methods

Patients with refractory AF underwent AV node ablation and were randomized (2:2:1) to BiV pacing with CLS, BiV pacing with accelerometer, or right ventricular (RV) pacing. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 6 months, with paired data available for 108 patients.

Results

The RV pacing contributed to significant increase in left atrial volume, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume, and LV mass compared to BiV pacing. Ejection fraction decreased insignificantly with RV pacing compared to significant increase with BiV pacing. Interventricular dyssynchrony significantly decreased with BiV compared with RV pacing. Closed Loop Stimulation® did not result in additional echocardiographic changes; heart rate distribution was significantly wider with CLS. All groups showed significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance, quality-of-life score, and New York Heart Association class.

Conclusion

In conclusion, RV pacing results in significant increase in left atrial volume, LV mass, and worsening of LV contractility compared to patients receiving BiV pacing post-AV node ablation for refractory AF. Closed Loop Stimulation® was not associated with additional structural changes but resulted in significantly wider heart rate distribution.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT00356057.

PII: S0002-8703(09)00884-9

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.012

American Heart Journal
Volume 159, Issue 2 , Pages 264-270, February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution