American Heart Journal
Volume 159, Issue 2 , Pages 176-182 , February 2010

Randomized comparison between clinical evaluation plus N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide versus exercise testing for decision making in acute chest pain of uncertain origin

  • Juan Sanchis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Juan Sanchis, MD, Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Clínic Universitari, Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 València, Spain.
  • ,
  • Xavier Bosch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Vicente Bodí, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Julio Núñez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Ada Doltra, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Magda Heras, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Luis Mainar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Enrique Santas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Ernest Bragulat, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Ana García-Alvarez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Arturo Carratalá, MD

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Biochemistry Department, University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Angel Llácer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Received 28 July 2009 ,Accepted 12 November 2009.

References 

  1. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Núñez J, et al. New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:443–449
  2. Farkouh ME, Smars PA, Reeder GS, et al. A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. N Eng J Med. 1998;339:1882–1888
  3. Diercks DB, Gibler B, Liu T, et al. Identification of patients at risk by graded exercise testing in an emergency department chest pain center. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:289–292
  4. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Diercks DB, et al. Immediate exercise testing to evaluate low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:251–256
  5. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Llácer A, et al. Exercise testing in a chest pain unit. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2002;55:1089–1092
  6. Ramakrishna G, Milavetz JJ, Zinsmeister AR, et al. Effect of exercise treadmill testing and stress imaging on the triage of patients with chest pain: CHEER substudy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:322–339
  7. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Núñez V, et al. Usefulness of early exercise testing and clinical risk score for prognostic evaluation in chest pain units without preexisting evidence of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:633–635
  8. Jeetley P, Burden L, Stoykova B, et al. Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomized controlled study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:204–211
  9. Candell Riera J, Oller Martínez G, de León G, et al. Yield of early rest and stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and electrocardiographic exercise test in patients with atypical chest pain, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram and negative biochemical markers in the emergency department. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1662–1666
  10. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:863–871
  11. Sanchis J, Bosch X, Bodí V, et al. Combination of clinical risk profile, early exercise testing and circulating biomarkers for evaluation of patients with acute chest pain, without ST-segment deviation or troponin elevation. Heart. 2008;94:311–315
  12. Geleijnse ML, Elhendy A, Kasprzak JD, et al. Safety and prognostic value of early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:397–406
  13. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Núñez J, et al. A practical approach with outcome for the prognostic assessment of non-ST-Segment elevation chest pain and normal troponin. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:707–801
  14. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJLM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina / non-ST elevation MI. A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000;284:835–842
  15. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Llácer A, et al. Emergency room risk stratification of patients with chest pain without ST-segment elevation. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003;56:955–962
  16. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Núñez J, et al. Limitations of clinical history for evaluation of patients with acute chest pain, non-diagnostic electrocardiogram and normal troponin. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:613–617
  17. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Núñez J, et al. Efficacy of coronary revascularization in patients with acute chest pain managed in chest pain unit. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:323–329
  18. d'Souza SP, Yellon DM, Martin C, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide limits infarct size in rat isolated hearts via KATP channel opening. Am J Physiol (Heart Cir Physiol). 2003;284:H1592–H1600
  19. d'Souza SP, Baxter GF. B-type natriuretic peptide: a good omen in myocardial ischemia. Heart. 2003;97:707–709
  20. De Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Bentley JH, et al. The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Eng J Med. 2001;345:1014–1021
  21. Jernberg T, Stridsberg M, Venge P, et al. N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide on admission for early risk stratification of patients with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:437–445
  22. Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide for risk assessment in unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction. B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in TACTICS-TIMI 18. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1262–1272
  23. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Mitrovic V, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels for dynamic risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004;110:3206–3212
  24. Galvani M, Ottani F, Oltrona L, et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide on admission has prognostic value across the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004;110:128–134
  25. Weber M, Bazzino O, Navarro JL, et al. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide assessment provides incremental prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndromes and normal troponin T values upon admission. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1188–1195
  26. Huelsmann M, Neuhold S, Strunk G, et al. NT-proBNP has a high negative predictive value to rule-out short-term cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2259–2264

 RCT no. NCT00493844.

PII: S0002-8703(09)00882-5

doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.010

American Heart Journal
Volume 159, Issue 2 , Pages 176-182 , February 2010