Atrial fibrillation and quality of life
Article Outline
Dear Editor:
Fleischmann et al have analyzed serial quality of life (QOL) measures using a Short Form-36, Specific Activity Scale, time trade-off in patients who had atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation.1 They have also concluded that in elderly patients, AF was not a major determinant of QOL. Authors argue that previous studies were small in size and used of invalidated measures to determine the QOL.2, 3 However, the major reason for treating patients with AF is to reduce the frequency of AF and also to decrease the disabling symptoms associated with its severity. There is documentation that QOL of patients with AF is poor compared not only to healthy individuals but also to patients with coronary artery disease.4 The odds ratio for total mortality in Framingham population after adjusting for age, heart disease, and various risk factors was 1.5 and 1.9 for male and female.5 Thus, AF is not a benign condition, and we need robust studies using a large population using well-validated measures like the one used by the authors for determining the burden of AF.
References
- Atrial fibrillation and quality of life after pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome: data from the Mode Selection Trial (MOST). Am Heart J. 2009;158:78–83.e2
- . Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1749–1757
- . Quality of life as an endpoint for atrial fibrillation research: pitfalls and practice. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(2 Suppl):B20–B25[discussion B25-6]
- Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med. 2006;119:448.e1–448.e19
- Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98:946–952
PII: S0002-8703(09)00729-7
doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.09.012
© 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Response to, "Atrial fibrillation and quality of life"
