Thank you for your interest in our recent publication.1 We fully agree that atrial fibrillation is not a benign condition. However, its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) can vary significantly from asymptomatic patients unaware of their arrhythmia to those whose symptoms are difficult to control despite optimal medical care. In this analysis of an older (mean age, 73 years) cohort undergoing pacemaker placement, atrial fibrillation was associated with a decrement in functional status as measured by the Specific Activity Scale but was not a major driver of overall HRQOL as measured by the SF-36. In this respect, our results are similar to those of the AFFIRM trial2 but are not necessarily generalizable to cohorts with different characteristics. Thus, we do not believe that the difference in atrial fibrillation seen between the 2 arms of the MOST trial fully explains the modest improvements in HRQOL seen with dual-chamber pacing.3
References
1. 1Fleischmann KE, Orav EJ, Lamas GA, et al.Atrial fibrillation and quality of life after pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome: data from the Mode Selection Trial (MOST). Am Heart J. 2009;158:78–83. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (260 KB)
|
CrossRef
2. 2The AFFIRM Investigators . Quality of life in atrial fibrillation: The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Am Heart J. 2005;149:112–120. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (625 KB)
|
CrossRef
3. 3Fleischmann KE, Orav EJ, Lamas GA, et al.Pacemaker implantation and quality of life in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST). Heart Rhythm. 2006;3:653–659. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (154 KB)
|
CrossRef