« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 158, Issue 3
, Pages 496-502
, September 2009
Are ejection fraction measurements by echocardiography and left ventriculography equivalent?
References
- ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction — Executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:671–719
- ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1–157
- . Reliability of reporting left ventricular systolic function by echocardiography: a systematic review of 3 methods. Am Heart J. 2003;146:388–397
- Godkar D, Bachu K, Dave B, et al. Comparison and co-relation of invasive and noninvasive methods of ejection fraction measurement. J Natl Med Assoc 2007;99:1227-8, 1231-34.
- Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques. Circulation. 1979;60:760–766
- Comparison of myocardial gated single photon emission computerised tomography, planar radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography in evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction, wall thickening and wall motion. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58:1120–1126
- Accuracy of noninvasive ejection fraction measurement in a large community-based clinic. Clin Med Res. 2005;3:75–82
- A 25-year perspective into the changing landscape of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (the Worcester Heart Attack Study). Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1373–1378
- A 30 year perspective (1975-2005) into the changing landscape of patients hospitalized with initial acute myocardial infarction: Worcester Heart Attack Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:88–95
- . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
- . Ejection fraction by echocardiography: The full Monty or just a peep show?. Am Heart J. 2003;146:380–382
- Quality assessment and quality control of echocardiographic performance in a large multicenter international study: Valsartan in Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:293–301
- . Performance of conventional echocardiographic parameters and myocardial measurements in the sequential evaluation of left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:706–711
- Echoventriculography — a simultaneous analysis of two-dimensional echocardiography and cineventriculography. Circulation. 1983;67:205–215
- 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:890–911
- Comparison of echocardiography and radionuclide angiography as predictors of mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (studies of left ventricular dysfunction). Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:299–303
- Ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography and contrast left ventriculogram. A tale of two techniques. SAVE Investigators. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:180–185
- Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients. Circulation. 2005;112:3738–3744
- Comparison of regional versus global assessment of left ventricular function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both after myocardial infarction: the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Echocardiographic Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:1462–1465
Funding support provided by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL35434).
PII: S0002-8703(09)00454-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.012
« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 158, Issue 3
, Pages 496-502
, September 2009
