American Heart Journal
Volume 158, Issue 3 , Pages e27-e34, September 2009

Mechanisms of exercise intolerance in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

  • Vy-Van Le, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
    • Department of Cardiology, VAPAHCS, Palo Alto, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Vy-Van Le, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Falk CVRC, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive Stanford, CA 94305.
  • ,
  • Marco V. Perez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Matthew T. Wheeler, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Jonathan Myers, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
    • Department of Cardiology, VAPAHCS, Palo Alto, CA
  • ,
  • Ingela Schnittger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Euan A. Ashley, MRCP, DPhil

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Received 13 March 2009; accepted 5 June 2009. published online 17 July 2009.

Aim

To determine the relation between echocardiogram findings and exercise capacity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Methods and Results

Sixty-three patients (48 ± 15 years) were referred for cardiopulmonary testing and exercise echocardiography. They were classified by morphology: proximal (n = 11), reverse curvature (n = 32), apical (n = 7), and concentric HCM (n = 13).

There were more women in proximal and reverse curvature groups. Proximal HCM patients were older. Maximal left ventricular thickness was highest in reverse curvature group. At peak exercise, concentric HCM achieved the lowest percent predicted maximal Vo2. Excluding apical group, no significant differences in gradient were noted between groups. Overall, no statistically significant correlation was found between peak Vo2, wall thickness, and gradient. Significant correlations were noted between peak Vo2 and indexed left atrial (LA) volume (r = −0.52), lateral E′ (r = 0.50), and lateral E/E′ ratio (r = −0.46). A multivariate model including age, lateral E′, indexed LA volume, and mitral A wave explained 46% of the variance in peak Vo2 (P = .01).

Conclusion

Lateral E′ and indexed LA volume are negatively correlated with functional capacity. Although patients with concentric morphology achieved the lowest peak Vo2, wall thickness and gradient did not predict exercise capacity.

 

PII: S0002-8703(09)00448-7

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.006

American Heart Journal
Volume 158, Issue 3 , Pages e27-e34, September 2009