American Heart Journal
Volume 157, Issue 3 , Pages 556-562, March 2009

Risk factor management after myocardial infarction: Reported adherence and outcomes

  • Carole Decker, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Mid America Heart Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, MO
    • University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Carole Decker, RN, PhD, Mid America Heart Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO 64111.
  • ,
  • Homaa Ahmad, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Kate Louise Moreng, MSVI

      Affiliations

    • University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
  • ,
  • Thomas M. Maddox, MD, SM

      Affiliations

    • Denver VAMC/University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
  • ,
  • Kimberly J. Reid, MS

      Affiliations

    • Mid America Heart Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, MO
  • ,
  • Philip G. Jones, MS

      Affiliations

    • Mid America Heart Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, MO
  • ,
  • John A. Spertus, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Mid America Heart Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, MO
    • University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

Received 18 August 2008; accepted 26 November 2008. published online 29 January 2009.

Background

Providing patients with documented discharge instructions is a performance measure of health care quality. It is not well known how often cardiac patients comply with the list of instructions or what their association is with health status outcomes after an acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

Acute myocardial infarction patients (N = 2,498) were prospectively enrolled into a 19-center study and asked, at 1 month, if they had recalled receiving instructions at discharge on any of the 13 secondary prevention behaviors (eg, exercise, medications, diet, and smoking). Adherence, defined as the percentage of relevant activities patients reported adhering to at 1 month, was grouped into 4 categories: poor (0%-49%), partial (50%-74%), careful (75%-99%), and very careful (100%).

Results

A total of 2,046 patients completed 1-month interviews and received instruction on at least 1 risk factor management (RFM) behavior. Very careful adherence at 1-month was reported most frequently with “taking medications as prescribed” (94%). In multivariable-adjusted models, patients who reported being poorly adherent were 58% more likely to report angina at 1 year as compared with those who very carefully followed RFM (relative risk 1.58, 95% CI 1.05-2.37). There was no independent association between RFM behavior and quality of life, physical functioning, rehospitalization, or mortality.

Conclusions

There is substantial variation in the types of RFM to which acute myocardial infarction patients adhere. In aggregate, stronger adherence was associated with less angina at 1 year. More research is needed to understand adherence patterns and its association with outcomes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(08)01045-4

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.022

American Heart Journal
Volume 157, Issue 3 , Pages 556-562, March 2009