Journal Home
Search for

Volume 157, Issue 3, Pages 412-422 (March 2009)


View previous. 7 of 37 View next.

Facts and controversies of aspirin and clopidogrel therapy

David P. Faxon, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jane E. Freedman, MDb

Received 25 April 2008; accepted 25 November 2008.

Because of the central role of platelets in mediating ischemic events, antiplatelet agents are critical components of atherothrombosis prevention. Given their robust safety and efficacy profiles, aspirin and clopidogrel are consistently recommended by evidence-based treatment guidelines. Despite these recommendations, controversies surrounding the appropriate application of aspirin and clopidogrel remain. Questions of appropriate dosing, length of therapy, and use of combination therapy are most pressing, and considerable debate exists regarding the variability of response to antiplatelet therapy, including the definition, measurement, and clinical relevance of responsiveness. This review discusses the facts and controversies surrounding the use of aspirin and clopidogrel. Overall, despite the existing controversies, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and/or clopidogrel remains a proven and essential therapeutic tool for safe and effective management of atherothrombotic risk in specific clinical settings.

a Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

b Division of Cardiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: David P. Faxon, MD, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Medicine, 0BC3 – Room 012P, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120.

PII: S0002-8703(08)01042-9

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.019


View previous. 7 of 37 View next.