American Heart Journal
Volume 157, Issue 3 , Pages 457-466, March 2009

Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on long-term quality of life: An analysis from the CArdiac Resynchronisation-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) study

  • John G.F. Cleland, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: John G. F. Cleland, Department of Cardiology, University of Hull HU16 5JQ, Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Melanie J. Calvert, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Yves Verboven, MScEng

      Affiliations

    • Medtronic Inc., Bakken Research Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Nick Freemantle, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Received 12 February 2008; accepted 13 November 2008. published online 21 January 2009.

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves quality of life (QoL) when measured 3 to 6 months after implantation, but whether these effects are sustained is unknown. The CArdiac Resynchronisation-Heart Failure study is the only long-term randomized trial of CRT with repeated measures of QoL.

Methods

Quality of life was measured at baseline and 3 months using generic European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions and disease-specific (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure) questionnaires and at 18 months and study-end using the latter instrument. Median follow-up was 29.6 (interquartile range 23.6-34.6) months.

Results

At baseline, patients had a substantially impaired QoL (mean European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions score 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.62) compared to an age-matched general population (0.78, 95% CI 0.76-0.80). Quality of life improved to a greater extent in patients assigned to CRT at each time point (P < .0001). By 18 months, the mean difference in disease-specific QoL score was 10.7 (95% CI 7.6-13.8) in favor of CRT, mostly due to improved physical functioning. Differences were sustained thereafter. Quality-adjusted life-years at 18 months increased by 0.13 (95% CI 0.07-0.182) and by 0.23 (95% CI 0.13-0.33) at study-end (both P < .0001). Little heterogeneity of effect across subgroups was observed.

Conclusion

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves long-term QoL and survival in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. The effects appear sustained, and therefore, the gain in quality-adjusted life years with CRT should be even greater during longer term follow-up.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(08)00983-6

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.006

American Heart Journal
Volume 157, Issue 3 , Pages 457-466, March 2009