American Heart Journal
Volume 157, Issue 3 , Pages 450-456, March 2009

Patient education and provider decision support to control blood pressure in primary care: A cluster randomized trial

  • Hayden B. Bosworth, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
    • Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences & Center for Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Hayden B. Bosworth, PhD, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (152), 508 Fulton St., Durham, NC 27705.
  • ,
  • Maren K. Olsen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
    • Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Tara Dudley, MStat

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Melinda Orr, MEd

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Mary K. Goldstein, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
  • ,
  • Santanu K. Datta, PhD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
    • Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Felicia McCant, MSW

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Pam Gentry, RN

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • David L. Simel, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
    • Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Eugene Z. Oddone, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC
    • Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC

Received 11 September 2008; accepted 3 November 2008. published online 12 January 2009.

Background

Less than one third of the 65 million Americans with hypertension have adequate blood pressure (BP) control. This study examined the effectiveness of 2 interventions for improving patient BP control.

Methods

This was a 2-level (primary care provider and patient) cluster randomized trial with 2-year follow-up occurring among patients with hypertension enrolled from a Veterans Affairs Medical Center primary care clinic. Primary care providers (n = 17) in the intervention received computer-generated decision support designed to improve guideline concordant medical therapy at each visit; control providers (n = 15) received a reminder at each visit. Patients received usual care or a bimonthly tailored nurse-delivered behavioral telephone intervention to improve hypertension treatment. The primary outcome was proportion of patients who achieved a BP <140/90 mm Hg (<130/85 for diabetic patients) over the 24-month intervention.

Results

Of the 816 eligible patients contacted, 190 refused and 38 were excluded. The 588 enrolled patients had a mean age of 63 years, 43% had adequate baseline BP control, and 482 (82%) completed the 24-month follow-up. There were no significant differences in amount of change in BP control in the 3 intervention groups as compared to the hypertension reminder control group. In secondary analyses, rates of BP control for all patients receiving the patient behavioral intervention (n = 294) improved from 40.1% to 54.4% at 24 months (P = .03); patients in the nonbehavioral intervention group improved from 38.2% to 43.9% (P = .38), but there was no between-group differences at the end of the study.

Conclusion

The brief behavioral intervention showed improved outcomes over time, but there were not significant between group differences.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Clinical trial registration no. NCT00105716.

 Dr. George A. Mensah served as guest editor for this manuscript.

PII: S0002-8703(08)00977-0

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.003

American Heart Journal
Volume 157, Issue 3 , Pages 450-456, March 2009