« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 156, Issue 5
, Pages 946-953.e2
, November 2008
Patterns of use and effectiveness of early invasive strategy in non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: An assessment by propensity score
References
- 2002 Update of the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology for unstable angina/without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2002;55:631–642
- Long-term outcome after an early invasive versus selective invasive treatment strategy in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and elevated cardiac troponin T (the ICTUS trial): a follow-up study. Lancet. 2007;369:827–835
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1598–1660
- Rationale and conceptual design of MASCARA study: a challenge in the evaluation of the effectiveness. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125:580–584
- MASCARA (Manejo del Síndrome Coronario Agudo. Registro Actualizado) study. Overall results. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008;(in press)
- . Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281
- . Biostatistical methods: the assessment of relative risks. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2000;
- . Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8 Pt 2):757–763
- . A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use. Stat Med. 2006;25:2084–2106
- Descripción del Estado de los Síndromes Coronarios Agudos en un Registro Temporal ESpañol. Estudio DESCARTES. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005;58:242–250
- TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:865–872
- Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. JAMA. 2004;292:2096–2104
- Achieving rapid door-to-balloon times: how top hospitals improve complex clinical systems. Circulation. 2006;113:1079–1085
- Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK). Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1450–1457
- Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease. Lancet. 2000;356:9–16
- Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005;293:2908–2917
- Access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: multinational registry study. BMJ. 2005;330:441
- Compari son of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1879–1887
The authors of this article have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The present study has been funded with grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (PI04/1408) and Red de Investigación Cardiovascular del Instituto Carlos III (RECAVA), and from an unrestricted grant of Bristol-Myers-Squibb.
PII: S0002-8703(08)00554-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.032
© 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 156, Issue 5
, Pages 946-953.e2
, November 2008
