American Heart Journal
Volume 156, Issue 3 , Pages 549-555, September 2008

Angiotensin inhibition in renovascular disease: A population-based cohort study

  • Daniel G. Hackam, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Daniel G. Hackam, Room 100K, Siebens Research Building 1400 Western Road, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 2V2.
  • ,
  • Minh L. Duong-Hua, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Muhammad Mamdani, PharmD, MA, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Ping Li, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Sheldon W. Tobe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • J. David Spence, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Amit X. Garg, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Division of Nephrology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Received 28 January 2008; accepted 6 May 2008. published online 21 July 2008.

Background

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers effectively reduce blood pressure in patients with renovascular disease (RVD); yet, randomized cardiovascular prevention trials of these drugs typically exclude individuals with this condition.

Patients and Methods

We studied the association of renin-angiotensin system inhibition with prognosis in a population-based cohort comprising 3,570 patients with RVD in Ontario, Canada; slightly more than half (n = 1,857, 53%) were prescribed angiotensin inhibitors. The primary outcome was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary outcomes included individual cardiovascular and renal events.

Results

Patients receiving angiotensin inhibitors had a significantly lower risk for the primary outcome during follow-up (10.0 vs 13.0 events per 100 patient-years at risk, multivariable adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82). In addition, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90), chronic dialysis initiation (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92), and mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-0.68) was lower in treated patients. Conversely, patients receiving angiotensin inhibitors were significantly more likely to be hospitalized for acute renal failure during follow-up (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.05-3.33; 1.2 vs 0.6 events per 100 patient-years at risk).

Conclusions

These data emphasize the high vascular risk of RVD and suggest that angiotensin inhibitors may improve prognosis in this setting at the expense of acute renal toxicity. If the latter are selected in the management of RVD, renal function parameters should be assiduously followed.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. None of the funding sources participated in the design or conduct of the research; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript.

 No conflicts of interest exist for D.G.H., M.L.D., M.M., P.L., or A.X.G. J.D.S. has consulted for Novartis and received lecture fees from Solvay. SWT has participated in research studies, advisory panels, and lectures with support from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck, and Novartis.

PII: S0002-8703(08)00385-2

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.013

American Heart Journal
Volume 156, Issue 3 , Pages 549-555, September 2008