American Heart Journal
Volume 156, Issue 2 , Pages 315-321, August 2008

Carvedilol increases blood pressure response to phenylephrine infusion in heart failure subjects with systolic dysfunction: Evidence of improved vascular α1-adrenoreceptor signal transduction

  • Benjamin W. Van Tassell, PharmD, BCPS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Benjamin W. Van Tassell, PharmD, BCPS, University of Utah, 30 South, 2000 East, Rm #258, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
  • ,
  • Matthew T. Rondina, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • ,
  • Franklin Huggins, PharmD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • ,
  • Edward M. Gilbert, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • ,
  • Mark A. Munger, PharmD, FCCP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
    • Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Received 12 February 2008; accepted 1 April 2008. published online 20 June 2008.

Introduction

α1-Adrenergic receptor (α1-AR) stimulation produces smooth muscle contraction, vasoconstriction, and myocyte hypertrophy, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for α1-AR antagonists to reduce cardiac workload and myocardial hypertrophy. Preliminary reports suggest that vascular α1-ARs are desensitized in heart failure (HF) in a manner similar to myocardial β1-ARs. We examined α1-AR signal transduction by repeat phenylephrine (PE) infusions in patients with HF receiving chronic carvedilol therapy.

Methods

Twelve subjects with HF not currently receiving β-blockers were up-titrated to maximum tolerable doses of carvedilol. Subjects underwent α1-AR stimulation testing at study baseline, 2 weeks after each dose titration, and 6 months after maintenance of maximum carvedilol dose. Phenylephrine infusions began at 0.5 μg kg−1 min−1, with dose titrations every 10 minutes, to a maximum of 5 μg kg−1 min−1. Phenylephrine dose response was evaluated by the PE rate required to elicit a 20 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure (BP), designated PS20.

Results

All doses of carvedilol significantly reduced preinfusion measures of heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure. However, carvedilol also produced a paradoxical trend toward PS20 reduction (indicating increased PE response) that reached significance at the completion of carvedilol dose titration (PS20 ratio vs baseline = 0.78; P < .001). All effects were maintained over a 6-month treatment period with no evidence of tolerance.

Conclusions

Increasing BP response to PE infusion suggests improvement in vascular α1-AR signal transduction with chronic carvedilol therapy. This effect is evident despite no detectable tolerance to preinfusion BP reductions. The varying affinities of α1-AR subtypes for carvedilol and PE may have contributed to this finding.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Investigator Initiated Trials.

 Conflict of interest: Benjamin W. Van Tassell, none; Matthew Rondina, none; Franklin Huggins, none; Mark A. Munger, GlaxoSmithKline Speakers Bureau and Research Grant Support; Edward M. Gilbert, GlaxoSmithKline Speakers Bureau and Research Grant Support.

PII: S0002-8703(08)00279-2

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.04.004

American Heart Journal
Volume 156, Issue 2 , Pages 315-321, August 2008