Journal Home
Search for

Volume 156, Issue 2, Pages 322-328 (August 2008)


View previous. 23 of 45 View next.

Short-term mortality and cost associated with cardiac device implantation in patients hospitalized with heart failure

Jason Swindle, MPHa, Thomas E. Burroughs, PhDa, Mark A. Schnitzler, PhDa, Paul J. Hauptman, MDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 7 January 2008; accepted 3 April 2008. published online 03 June 2008.

Background

The use of implantable cardiac devices in the management of heart failure has increased, but patient selection and inhospital outcomes in clinical practice have not been critically explored. Therefore, we evaluated the inhospital mortality and costs associated with patients with heart failure who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization device, or device lead.

Methods

We analyzed admissions with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes for implantation/revision of cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization device and a primary or secondary diagnosis code for heart failure in a prospective hospital database from 2004 to 2005. Odds ratios were calculated to quantify risk for mortality. Average accumulated costs over time were calculated before and after day of first device implant procedure.

Results

Among 27,907 hospitalizations, inhospital mortality varied based on day of device implantation and use of intravenous inotropic therapy. Mortality was 0.3% for patients who did not require inotropic drugs versus 3.3%, 6.6%, and 15.2% for patients who required initiation of drug before, on the day of, or after device implantation, respectively. Logistic regression demonstrated that the most potent risk for inhospital mortality was the use of inotropic drugs. Similar trends were observed for any vasoactive therapy. There was a marked increase in costs associated with these admissions.

Conclusions

Implantation of cardiac devices during a hospitalization for heart failure may be associated with significant inhospital mortality if patients require intravenous vasoactive therapy. Risk stratification methodology that incorporates ongoing/anticipated need for these drugs will likely improve clinical decision making.

a Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO

b Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Paul J. Hauptman, MD, Division of Cardiology, Saint Louis University Hospital 3635 Vista Ave, St Louis, MO 63110.

 The study is supported in part by National Institutes of Health RO1-AG021515 (Dr P Hauptman).

 Dr Hauptman: Grant support from the National Institutes of Health; local site coinvestigator on the SCD-HeFT trial. Mr Swindle: No relevant financial relationships. Dr Burroughs: No relevant financial relationships. Dr Schnitzler: No relevant financial relationships.

PII: S0002-8703(08)00276-7

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.04.003


View previous. 23 of 45 View next.