American Heart Journal
Volume 155, Issue 6 , Pages 1068-1074 , June 2008

Predicting major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention: The Texas Heart Institute risk score

  • Pankaj Madan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, The Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Pankaj Madan, MD, 11947, Keystone Spring Way, Houston, TX 77089.
    • ,
  • MacArthur A. Elayda, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, The Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX
    • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX
    • ,
  • Vei-Vei Lee, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX
    • ,
  • James M. Wilson, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, The Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX

Received 29 September 2007 ,Accepted 24 January 2008.

References 

  1. Hannan E, Racz M, Ryan T, et al. Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA. 1997;277:892–898
  2. Ellis S, Weintraub W, Holmes D, et al. Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. Circulation. 1997;95:2479–2484
  3. O'Connor G, Malenka D, Quinton H, et al. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions in 1994-1996. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:681–691
  4. Moscucci M, Kline-Rogers E, Share D, et al. Simple bedside additive tool for prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation. 2001;104:263–268
  5. Resnic F, Ohno-Machado L, Selwyn A, et al. Simplified risk score models accurately predict the risk of major in-hospital complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:5–9
  6. Shaw R, Anderson H, Brindis R, et al. Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) experience: 1998-2000. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1104–1112
  7. Qureshi M, Safian R, Grines C, et al. Simplified scoring system for predicting mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1890–1895
  8. Singh M, Lennon R, Holmes DJ, et al. Correlates of procedural complications and a simple integer risk score for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:387–393
  9. van Houwelingen J, le Cessie S. Predictive value of statistical models. Stat Med. 1990;9:1303–1325
  10. Singh M, Rihal C, Lennon R, et al. Prediction of complications following nonemergency percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:907–912
  11. Rathore S, Rhys J, Buchalter M, et al. Impact of age on the outcomes of women following percutaneous coronary intervention in the bare-metal stent era. J Interv Cardiol. 2006;19:245–249
  12. Singh M, Rihal C, Lennon R, et al. A critical appraisal of current models of risk stratification for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J. 2005;149:753–760
  13. Singh M, Rihal C, Selzer F, et al. Validation of Mayo Clinic risk adjustment model for in-hospital complications after percutaneous coronary interventions, using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute dynamic registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1722–1728
  14. Matheny M, Ohno-Machado L, Resnic F. Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:367–375

PII: S0002-8703(08)00139-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.034

American Heart Journal
Volume 155, Issue 6 , Pages 1068-1074 , June 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution