« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 155, Issue 1
, Pages 6-8
, January 2008
Establishing the effectiveness of coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction
References
- A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:673–679
- Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1879–1887
- . Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20
- Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1949–1956
- Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1093–1104
- Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2308–2320
- Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1809–1840
- Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005;293:2908–2917
- Cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: results from the stent primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (stent-PAMI) trial. Circulation. 2001;104:3039–3045
- Cost and cost-effectiveness of an early invasive vs conservative strategy for the treatment of unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2002;288:1851–1858
- ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:E1–E211
- ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 2002 Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1–e157
- Pilote L, Beck CA, Eisenberg MJ, et al. Comparing invasive and non-invasive management strategies for acute myocardial infarction using administrative databases. Am Heart J 2008;155:42-8.
- . Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281
- . Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assn. 1996;91:444–455
- Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough?. Health Serv Res. 1997;31:659–678
- Can cardiovascular clinical characteristics be identified and outcome models be developed from an in-patient claims database?. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:166–169
- . Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1261–1267
PII: S0002-8703(07)00832-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.018
© 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 155, Issue 1
, Pages 6-8
, January 2008
