« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 154, Issue 3
, Pages 545-553
, September 2007
A comparison of mortality, myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization for sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents
References
- . Adult Cardiac Surgery in New York State: 1993-1995. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/consumer/heart/cabg935.pdf2005;Accessed May 8, 2006
- . Angioplasty in New York State: 1995 Report. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/reports/report.htm2005;Accessed May 8, 2006
- New York State Department of Health. Adult Cardiac Surgery in New York State: 2001-2003. 2005. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/consumer/heart/coronary.pdf, http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/heart/pdf/2001-2003_cabg.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2006.
- . Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in New York State: 2001-2003. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/heart/pdf/pci_2001-2003.pdf2005;Accessed May 8, 2006
- A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–495
- A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496–501
- Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85:916–927
- Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:701–706
- A comparison of coronary-artery stenting with angioplasty for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:817–822
- Improved clinical outcome after widespread use of coronary-artery stenting in Canada. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1957–1965
- Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:561–566
- A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes for balloon angioplasty and coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:395–403
- Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1315–1323
- Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation. 2004;109:634–640
- One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation. 2004;109:1942–1947
- Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation. 2003;108:788–794
- A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1773–1780
- Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1215–1223
- Sirolimus-eluting stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:2727–2734
- Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: the TAXUS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1206–1212
- TAXUS I: six- and 12-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation. 2003;107:38–42
- A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:221–231
- Clinical efficacy of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multi-center, randomized trial. Circulation. 2005;112:3306–3313[Epub 2005 Nov 14]
- A paclitaxel-eluting stent for the prevention of coronary restenosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1537–1545
- Inhibition of restenosis with a paclitaxel-eluting, polymer-free coronary stent: the European evaLUation of pacliTaxel Eluting Stent (ELUTES) trial. Circulation. 2004;109:487–493
- Non–polymer-based paclitaxel-coated coronary stents for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary lesions. Angiographic follow-up of the DELIVER clinical trial. Circulation. 2004;109:1948–1954
- Paclitaxel-eluting stent for cytostatic prevention of restenosis: PATENCY study follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(Suppl 1):3H
- . Meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:640–643
- . Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in percutaneous coronary interventions (a meta-analysis). Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1146–1152
- Thirty-day incidence and six-month clinical outcome of thrombotic stent occlusion after bare-metal, sirolimus, or paclitaxel stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:947–953
- What is the risk of stent thrombosis associated with the use of paclitaxel-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary interventions? A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:941–946
- Angiographic findings of the multicenter Randomized Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting BX Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL): sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation. 2002;106:1949–1956
- TAXUS III trial: in-stent restenosis treated with stent-based delivery of paclitaxel incorporated in a slow-release polymer formulation. Circulation. 2003;107:559–564
- Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:165–171
- A prospective randomized comparison between paclitaxel and sirolimus stents in the real world of interventional cardiology: the TAXI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:308–311
- Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:663–670
- Sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:895–904
- Comparison of the effectiveness of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for small coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:589–594
- Comparison of short- (one month) and long-(twelve months) term outcomes of sirolimus-versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in 293 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries). Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:358–362
- Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:663–670
- Clinical outcome following aleatory implantation of paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents in complex coronary lesions. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1663–1668
- Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005;294:819–825
- . The robust inference for the proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:1074–1078
- . Survival analysis using the SAS system. Cary (NC): The SAS Institute; 1995;
- . Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:516–524
- Long-term outcomes for coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs. stent implantation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2174–2183
PII: S0002-8703(07)00455-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.05.017
© 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 154, Issue 3
, Pages 545-553
, September 2007
