American Heart Journal
Volume 154, Issue 1 , Pages 54-61, July 2007

Global outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Comparisons of the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25) registry and trial

  • Benjamin A. Steinberg, BA

      Affiliations

    • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Nazanin Moghbeli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Jacqueline Buros, BA

      Affiliations

    • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Mikhail Ruda, MD

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
  • ,
  • Alexander Parkhomenko, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Cardiology, Kiev, Ukraine
  • ,
  • B. Soma Raju, MD

      Affiliations

    • Care Hospital, Hyderabad, India
  • ,
  • Armando García-Castillo, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Hospital de'Enfermedades Cardiovasculares y del Torax, Monterrey, Mexico
  • ,
  • Marianna Janion, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Swietokrzyskie Centrum Kardiologii, Kielce, Poland
  • ,
  • José C. Nicolau, MD, PhD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Keith A.A. Fox, MB, ChB

      Affiliations

    • University of Edinburgh, Cardiovascular Research, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • David A. Morrow, MD, MPH, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Elliott M. Antman, MD, TIMI Study Group, 350 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.

Received 30 November 2006; accepted 28 March 2007. published online 10 May 2007.

Background

Outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) differ between those in clinical trials and those in routine practice, as well as across different regions. We hypothesized that adjustment for baseline risk would minimize such variations.

Methods

The Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (ExTRACT-TIMI) 25 registry was an observational study of patients with STEMI presenting to hospitals participating in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 randomized clinical trial. Consecutive patients with STEMI who were not enrolled in the trial were entered into the registry. Demographics, in-hospital therapies, and in-hospital events were collected. Baseline risk was assessed using the TIMI Risk Index for STEMI. To adjust for differences among the countries from which the patients presented, the gross national income per annum per capita (GNI) was used.

Results

A total of 3726 patients were registered from 109 sites in 25 countries. Patients in the registry had a higher baseline risk than those in the trial; they had more extensive prior cardiac histories and more comorbidities. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in the registry (8.3%) than in the trial (6.6%) (hazard ratio, 1.30; P < .001); however, after adjusting for TIMI Risk Index, mortality was similar (hazard ratioadj, 1.00; P = .97). The GNI was not significantly predictive of in-hospital mortality in the multivariable model of the registry.

Conclusion

Patients in the registry had higher mortality than those in the trial. This difference could be explained by the higher baseline risk of patients in the registry. After adjusting for baseline risk, the GNI of the country in which the patient presented did not contribute to predicting in-hospital mortality.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Mr Steinberg is a research fellow supported by Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Great Falls, VA.

PII: S0002-8703(07)00275-X

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.047

American Heart Journal
Volume 154, Issue 1 , Pages 54-61, July 2007