American Heart Journal
Volume 154, Issue 1 , Pages 151-157, July 2007

Does coronary angioplasty after timely thrombolysis improve microvascular perfusion and left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction?

  • Luciano Agati, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, “La Sapienza” University, Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Luciano Agati, MD, Department of Cardiology, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • ,
  • Stefania Funaro, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
  • ,
  • Mariapina Madonna, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, “La Sapienza” University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Gennaro Sardella, MD, FACC, FESC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, “La Sapienza” University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Barbara Garramone, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Leonarda Galiuto, MD, PhD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

Received 12 October 2006; accepted 19 March 2007.

Background

Recent data show that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable postthrombolytic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is better than no PCI or ischemia-guided PCI. These results still have to find a pathophysiologic explanation. We hypothesized that complete mechanical recanalization of infarct-related artery improves clinical benefits of thrombolysis as a result of more preserved and better perfused coronary microcirculation. To test this hypothesis, we studied a selected STEMI population presenting very early after symptom onset in whom successful infarct-related artery reperfusion was obtained by thrombolysis followed or not by elective PCI within 24 hours, and we compared these 2 groups with those underwent primary PCI.

Methods

This study analyzed 96 patients with STEMI randomized within 3 hours from symptom onset to primary PCI (group A, n = 36), tenecteplase followed within 24 hours by PCI (group B, n = 30), or to tenecteplase alone (group C, n = 30). Microvascular perfusion was assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography. Regional contrast score, endocardial length and area of contrast defect on day 2 (T1) and at predischarge (T2), left ventricular end-diastolic volume, regional wall motion score, extent of wall motion abnormalities, and ejection fraction at T1, T2, and at 3 months' follow-up were calculated.

Results

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were not statistically different between groups. The extent of microvascular damage and of myocardial salvage was similar in primary PCI–treated or in invasively treated patients after lytic administration. Conversely, group C patients, although treated very early with fibrinolytic therapy, showed higher extent of microvascular damage and infarct size and a more depressed left ventricular function after reperfusion and at follow-up.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that early PCI after lysis is more effective in preserving myocardial perfusion and function than lysis alone and may be a helpful alternative when primary PCI is not available.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(07)00252-9

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.028

American Heart Journal
Volume 154, Issue 1 , Pages 151-157, July 2007