American Heart Journal
Volume 152, Issue 3 , Pages 454.e1-454.e8, September 2006

National evaluation of adherence to β-blocker therapy for 1 year after acute myocardial infarction in patients with commercial health insurance

  • Judith M. Kramer, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Duke Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Judith M. Kramer, MD, MS, Duke Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715.
  • ,
  • Bradley Hammill, MA

      Affiliations

    • Duke Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Kevin J. Anstrom, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Duke Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Donald Fetterolf, MD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Richard Snyder, MD

      Affiliations

    • Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • John P. Charde, MD

      Affiliations

    • Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Barbara S. Hoffman, PA-C, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Nancy Allen LaPointe, PharmD

      Affiliations

    • Duke Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Eric Peterson, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Duke Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Received 30 January 2006; accepted 17 February 2006. published online 30 June 2006.

Background

Quality measures of evidence-based medications post–myocardial infarction have focused on prescription at hospital discharge. Yet survival benefits of these medications are best realized with sustained therapy. We sought to examine long-term β-blocker adherence over the first year after myocardial infarction in patients with commercial health insurance and prescription drug benefits.

Methods

This multicenter analysis examined health plan records from members of 11 health plans who had myocardial infarction in 2001, survived at least 1 year, and maintained insurance coverage (N = 17035). The primary outcome measure was adherence to β-blockers (defined as prescription claims covering ≥75% of days) for 360 days post-discharge. We also examined associations with adherence—time from discharge, health plan product (commercial or Medicare + Choice [M + C]), age (35-64 or ≥65), sex, and region.

Results

For 360 days after discharge, only 45% of patients were adherent to β-blockers, with the biggest drop in adherence between 30 and 90 days. In a multivariable model, statistically significant predictors of lower adherence were participation in M + C product, residence in the Southeast, and age (driven by young participants in M + C and young females in commercial products).

Conclusions

In a population of patients with health insurance and prescription drug coverage, adherence to β-blocker therapy in the first year after myocardial infarction is poor, indicating that factors other than medication cost are important determinants of long-term adherence. Quality improvement initiatives focused on long-term adherence are needed to realize maximal benefit from medical therapy in post–myocardial infarction patients.

 

 Duke investigators are supported in part by grant HS010548 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Md.

 Funding/Support: Participating health plans contributed personnel time for work groups (listed in Appendix B) and for collection and reporting of data. The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) contracted with PricewaterhouseCoopers to aggregate de-identified data submitted by health plans and to provide feedback to the plans on the quality of data. The CAQH also provided an honorarium to Duke University for its investigators' time in analyzing and interpreting the aggregated data and preparing the manuscript.

 Role of the Sponsor: CAQH provided a project manager to support the CAQH Cardiac and Measurement Work Groups. Final decisions on study design and technical specifications were made by the CAQH Cardiac and Measurement Work Groups. The CAQH allowed Duke investigators full independence in the analysis and interpretation of the data. The manuscript was prepared by Duke investigators. Contributing authors provided review and approval.

 Guest editor of this manuscript is Deepak L. Bhatt, MD.

PII: S0002-8703(06)00169-4

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.030

American Heart Journal
Volume 152, Issue 3 , Pages 454.e1-454.e8, September 2006