American Heart Journal
Volume 152, Issue 3 , Pages 461-468, September 2006

Sex and classic risk factors after myocardial infarction: a community study

  • Yariv Gerber, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
    • Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Susan A. Weston, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Jill M. Killian, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Steven J. Jacobsen, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
    • Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Received 6 December 2005; accepted 5 February 2006. published online 30 June 2006.

Background

Sex-specific data on classic risk factors and their impact after myocardial infarction (MI) in the community are lacking. We evaluated the prevalence and association of classic risk factors with recurrent ischemic events in patients with MI and tested the hypothesis that they differed by sex.

Methods

All patients (1104, 45% women) from Olmsted County, Minnesota, hospitalized with an incident MI between 1990 and 1998 were identified using standardized criteria and followed-up (mean 3.7 years) for recurrent ischemic events, defined as recurrent MI, ischemic stroke, or coronary death. Data on hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and obesity at index hospitalization were analyzed individually and in clusters.

Results

Women were older than men (73 vs 64 years, P < .001) and had more risk factors. During follow-up, 423 events occurred. For women, the adjusted risk of recurrent events increased with hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. For men, no increase in risk was detected with any risk factor. The population attributable risk of all risk factors combined was 46% (95% CI 29%-62%) in women and 19% (95% CI 6%-35%) in men. As the number of risk factors increased from 1 to ≥4, compared with no risk factors, the adjusted hazard ratio in women increased progressively (1.12, 1.82, 2.34, and 2.68, respectively), whereas no trend was detected in men (1.40, 1.27, 1.24, and 1.37, respectively) (P = .01 for effect modification by sex).

Conclusions

Classic risk factors are highly prevalent and often clustered in MI, especially among women. Although their predictive value for recurrent ischemic events is marginal in men, strong associations exist in women, which define secondary prevention opportunities.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by the grants from the Public Health Service and the National Institutes of Health (AR30582, R01 HL 59205 and R01 HL 72435), Bethesda, MD and a Postdoctoral Fellowship Award from the American Heart Association, Greater Midwest Affiliate (0525753Z; Dr Gerber), Dallas, TX.

 The funding sources for this study played no role in the design or conduct of the study; data management and analysis; or manuscript preparation, review, and authorization for submission.

PII: S0002-8703(06)00123-2

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.003

American Heart Journal
Volume 152, Issue 3 , Pages 461-468, September 2006