American Heart Journal
Volume 152, Issue 1 , Pages 118-125, July 2006

The impact of the ESC/ACC redefinition of myocardial infarction and new sensitive troponin assays on the frequency of acute myocardial infarction

  • Peter A. Kavsak, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute at Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Peter A. Kavsak, PhD, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main Street, W, HSC 2N52, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.
  • ,
  • Andrew R. MacRae, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Viliam Lustig, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Rakesh Bhargava, MD

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute at Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Rudy Vandersluis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute at Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Glenn E. Palomaki, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Marie-Jeanne Yerna, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Immunotech S.A.S., a Beckman-Coulter Subsidiary, Marseilles, France
  • ,
  • Allan S. Jaffe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Division and Division of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Received 19 July 2005; accepted 21 September 2005.

Background

The prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has increased due to the recent definitions, but the magnitude of this effect using contemporary highly sensitive troponin assays is unclear. The objective of this study is to compare the diagnosis of AMI using a contemporary troponin I (cTnI) biomarker and the 2003 American Heart Association (AHA) case definition with diagnoses made using the 1994 World Health Organization MONICA definition.

Methods

Contemporary troponin I measurements were performed with the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI assay (Chaska, MN) on plasma specimens originally assayed in 1996 for creatine kinase (CK)–MB mass from 486 emergency department patients presenting within 24 hours of onset of symptoms suggestive of cardiac ischemia.

Results

In a subgroup of 258 patients with 2 specimens drawn at least 6 hours apart (the AHA “adequate set of biomarkers”), AMI prevalence using CK-MB was 19.4% (95% CI 15.0-24.7) based on MONICA and 19.8% (15.4-25.1) based on the AHA case definition using the criterion for change of ≥20% between specimens. Using cTnI as the biomarker of choice, under the AHA definition, the prevalence increased to as high as 35.7% (30.1-41.7, a relative increase of 84%, P < .001) using the 99th percentile cutoff. In 121 patients with a lower index of suspicion and without the requisite 6-hour interval between measurements, positivity increased from 5% with CK-MB by MONICA up to 12% to 16% with cTnI by AHA.

Conclusions

A highly sensitive contemporary cTnI assay used with the AHA case definition results in a 62% to 84% increase in the frequency of AMI diagnosis compared with MONICA criteria.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was partially supported by funds from Beckman Coulter Inc (Chaska, MN). The generous support of the Auxiliary of Lakeridge Health Oshawa, and the Oshawa General Hospital Foundation (Ontario, Canada) is gratefully acknowledged in enabling this study.

PII: S0002-8703(05)00879-3

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.09.022

American Heart Journal
Volume 152, Issue 1 , Pages 118-125, July 2006