American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 4 , Pages 943.e1-943.e4 , April 2006

Left ventricular remodeling impacts the function of the Quattro stentless mitral valve bioprosthesis (a 4-year experience)

Received 11 December 2003 ,Accepted 15 August 2005.

References 

  1. Straub U, Feindt P, Huwer H, et al. Postoperative assessment of chordal preservation and changes in cardiac geometry following mitral valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10:734–744
  2. Nakayama M, Yutani C, Imakita M, et al. Differences in left ventricular response between rheumatic and myxomatous mitral valve disease following mitral valve replacement. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;48:751–756
  3. Tischler MD, Cooper KA, Rowen M, et al. Mitral valve replacement versus miral valve repair. A Doppler and quantitative stress echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1994;89:132–137
  4. Doss M, Martens S, Wood JP, et al. Performance of stentless vs. stented aortic valve prostheses in the elderly patient. A prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:299–304
  5. Aybek T, Simaon A, Dogan S, et al. Two years clinical experience with a quadrileaflet stentless bioprosthesis in the mitral position. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000;9:667–673
  6. Yun KL, Sintek CF, Miller DC, et al. Randomized trial comparing partial versus complete chordal sparing mitral valve replacement: effects on left ventricular volume and function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:707–714
  7. Middlemost SJ, Sussmann M, Patel A, et al. The stentless quadrileaflet bovine pericardial mitral valve: early clinical results. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:174–179
  8. Walther T, Walther C, Falk V, et al. Early clinical results after stentless mitral valve implantation and comparison with conventional valve repair or replacement. Circulation. 1999;100(Suppl II):II-78–II-83

PII: S0002-8703(05)00878-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.022

American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 4 , Pages 943.e1-943.e4 , April 2006