Journal Home
Search for

Volume 151, Issue 6, Pages 1139-1146 (June 2006)


View previous. 7 of 52 View next.

Coronary artery calcium scanning: Clinical paradigms for cardiac risk assessment and treatment

Harvey S. Hecht, MD, FACCaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Matthew J. Budoff, MD, FACCb, Daniel S. Berman, MD, FACCcde, James Ehrlich, MDf, John A. Rumberger, MD, PhD, FACCg

Received 3 May 2005; accepted 12 July 2005.

Background

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is being increasingly used for cardiac risk assessment in asymptomatic patients, particularly in those with a Framingham 10-year risk of 10% to 20%. Physician awareness of this technology and its appropriate uses and limitations is crucial to appropriate use.

Methods

With the goal of establishing clinical paradigms, this document integrates the results of key published articles, Framingham Risk Score, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Plan III guidelines, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association exercise testing and angiographic guidelines, and the authors' extensive clinical experience.

Results

Coronary artery calcium scanning is best used in the asymptomatic population with a 10% to 20% risk of cardiac events over 10 years, with selected application in higher and lower risk categories. In the 10%-20% risk patient, coronary artery calcium scores >100 or >75th percentile for age and sex transform the moderately high-risk patient to higher risk status with the attendant recommendation for more aggressive therapy; scores from 11 to 100 and <75th percentile are consistent with the 10%-20% 10-year risk status and scores from 0 to 10 and <75th percentile convert the patient to lesser risk categories. If stress testing is planned in the asymptomatic patient, it should be preceded by coronary artery calcium scanning and performed only for scores >400; it should always precede coronary angiography in these patients.

Conclusions

Coronary artery calcium scanning is an important risk assessment tool with direct clinical applications; it is of particular utility in the Framingham 10%-20% 10-year risk population.

a Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York, NY

b Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA

c Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

d Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

e The Burns and Allen Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

f George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

g Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Harvey S. Hecht, MD, FACC, Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, 130 E. 77th St., New York, NY 10021.

PII: S0002-8703(05)00737-4

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.018


View previous. 7 of 52 View next.