« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 5
, Pages 969-975
, May 2006
Missed opportunities in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction: An assessment of the effects of statin underprescribing on mortality
References
- . Heart disease and stroke statistics—2004 update. Dallas (Tex): American Heart Association; 2003;
- . Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;326:1423
- Cholesterol and recurrent events: a secondary prevention trial for normolipidemic patients. CARE Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:98C–106C
- Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1301–1307
- . Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389
- Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1623–1630
- . Did the major clinical trials of statins affect prescribing behaviour?. CMAJ. 2001;164:1695–1696
- Use of lipid-lowering medications at discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3. Circulation. 2001;103:38–44
- . Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox. JAMA. 2004;291:1864–1870
- Quality of cardiac care in Ontario. Toronto (Ontario): Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2004;
- Predicting mortality among patients hospitalized for heart failure: derivation and validation of a clinical model. JAMA. 2003;290:2581–2587
- . Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:516–524
- . Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:757–763
- . Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:327–333
- . Rare outcomes, common treatments: analytic strategies using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:693–695
- . The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55
- . Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281
- Clinical outcomes in statin treatment trials: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1793–1802
- . What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1691
- . Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models in cardiovascular research. Am Stat. 2004;58:131–137
- CCORT/CCS quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction care. Can J Cardiol. 2003;19:38–45
- . Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2002;288:462–467
- Lipid disorders: justification of methods and goals of treatment. Chest. 2001;120:979–988
- Recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of the 2003 update. CMAJ. 2003;169:921–924
- Risk for myopathy with statin therapy in high-risk patients. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:553–564
- . How well tolerated are lipid-lowering drugs?. Drugs Aging. 2001;18:665–683
- Safety considerations for statins. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13:637–644
- . MRC/BHF heart protection study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7–22
- Cholesterol-lowering therapy in women and elderly patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris: findings from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Circulation. 1997;96:4211–4218
- Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Diabetes Care. 1997;20:614–620
The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences is supported in part by a grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care. The opinions, results, and conclusions are those of the authors and no endorsement by the Ministry of Health and Long-term Care or by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences is intended or should be inferred. This research was supported in part by operating grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation to the Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team. Drs Austin, Mamdani, and Juurlink are supported by New Investigator awards from the CIHR. Dr Juurlink is also supported by the University of Toronto Drug Safety Research Group. Dr Alter is supported by a New Investigator award from the CIHR and the Heart and Stroke Foundation. Dr Tu is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Health Services Research.
PII: S0002-8703(05)00651-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.06.034
© 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 5
, Pages 969-975
, May 2006
