American Heart Journal
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 220.e1-220.e5, August 2005

A randomized trial comparing clopidogrel versus ticlopidine therapy in patients undergoing infarct artery stenting for acute myocardial infarction with abciximab as adjunctive therapy

  • Guido Parodi, MD, PhD, FESC

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Guido Parodi, MD, PhD, FESC, Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, I-50134, Florence, Italy.
  • ,
  • Roberto Sciagrà, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Angela Migliorini, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Gentian Memisha, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Guia Moschi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Renato Valenti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Alberto Pupi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • David Antoniucci, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy

Received 14 February 2005; accepted 7 April 2005.

Aim

To evaluate the impact of a clopidogrel therapy on the effectiveness of myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing routine infarct-related artery (IRA) stent implantation and receiving routine abciximab therapy.

Background

Inflammatory processes after mechanical restoration of flow in AMI play a central role in decreasing the effectiveness of reperfusion at microcirculatory level. Several studies suggest that clopidogrel may exert a protective effect against adverse cardiovascular events by virtue of its anti-inflammatory properties.

Methods

A total of 133 patients with a first ST-elevation AMI were randomized to clopidogrel (600-mg loading dose before IRA stenting followed by 75 mg daily, n = 66) or ticlopidine (500 mg before IRA stenting followed by 250 mg twice daily, n = 67). The primary end point was scintigraphic infarct size at 1 month. The secondary end points were ST-segment elevation resolution within 3 hours of procedure and 1-month clinical outcome, as a composite of death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke within 1 month of the index procedure.

Results

The 1-month technetium 99m sestamibi scintigraphy revealed similar infarct size (16.2% ± 14.6% vs 15.0% ± 14.1%, P = .703) and severity (0.48 ± 0.18 vs 0.49 ± 0.15, P = .592) in the clopidogrel group as compared with the ticlopidine group. Three-hour ST-segment resolution rate was similar in the 2 study groups (86% vs 89%, P = .642). At 1 month, there was no difference in major cardiovascular adverse event rate (3% vs 3%, P = .988). Discontinuation of thienopiridine therapy within the first month occurred in no patient randomized to clopidogrel and in 3 (4.5%) patients randomized to ticlopidine (P = .082).

Conclusion

Clopidogrel has no impact on the effectiveness of myocardial reperfusion in patients with AMI treated routinely with stenting and abciximab. However, clopidogrel, administered as a 600-mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily, is safe and at least as effective as the standard ticlopidine therapy in this subgroup of patients.

 

 This study was supported by a research grant from the ARCARD ONLUS Foundation, Florence, Italy.

PII: S0002-8703(05)00387-X

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.010

American Heart Journal
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 220.e1-220.e5, August 2005