American Heart Journal
Volume 150, Issue 5 , Pages 933.e9-933.e13, November 2005

A pilot study: The Noninvasive Surface Cooling Thermoregulatory System for Mild Hypothermia Induction in Acute Myocardial Infarction (The NICAMI Study)

  • Hung Q. Ly, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • André Denault, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Jocelyn Dupuis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Alain Vadeboncoeur, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • François Harel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • André Arsenault, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • C. Michael Gibson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
  • ,
  • Raoul Bonan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Raoul Bonan, MD, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1T 1C8.
    • This author is a Medivance consultant and was supported by a research grant.

Received 27 October 2004; accepted 14 February 2005.

Article Outline

Background

Hypothermia reduces metabolic demands, limits reperfusion injury, and helps salvage the injured myocardium during ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess early induction of noninvasive mild hypothermia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

This was a safety and feasibility study of the Medivance Arctic Sun noninvasive thermoregulatory system (Medivance Inc, Louisville, Colo), used as adjunctive therapy in patients with first-time STEMI. Cooling was initiated by circulating chilled water through the Arctic Sun Energy Transfer Pads placed on the patient before primary PCI. Target temperature was 34.5°C, maintained during 3 hours. Shivering was controlled with intravenous meperidine, and meperidine-related nausea was prevented with intravenous ondansetron.

Results

Nine patients underwent successful noninvasive surface cooling. All patients were Killip class I with a mean age of 62 years (8/9 males). Successful primary stenting was performed in all patients with glycoprotein inhibitors administered in 6 of 9 cases. Mean cooling time from induction to target temperature was 79 minutes (49 minutes in the last 4 enrolled cases). Mean total cooling duration was 267 minutes. Mean peak troponin T was 5.81 μg/L. Final TIMI flow grade 3 and final TIMI perfusion grade 3 were achieved in 9 of 9 patients and in 3 of 9 patients, respectively. Mean infarct size (by Myoview single photon emission computed tomography scans) was 23%. No hemodynamic or arrhythmic instability were documented.

Conclusion

Mild hypothermia can be safely induced with noninvasive surface cooling in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, allowing earlier myocardial protection before mechanical reperfusion therapy.

 

The goal in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the prompt restoration of coronary blood flow with current trends favoring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1, 2 Reperfusion at the epicardial and microvascular level remains the cornerstone of the initial therapy to limit ischemic injury at the cellular level. Nevertheless, reperfusion injury may still occur after adequate flow restoration and jeopardize the ischemic myocardium.

A promising avenue for myocardial salvage lies in the protective effects of clinically induced mild hypothermia. Both experimental models and clinical experience have proven the beneficial effects of this treatment modality in various clinical settings.3 Studies have previously shown reduction in myocardial infarct size resulting from diminished metabolic demands on the injured myocardium.4, 5 More recently, Dixon et al6 have shown the safety of invasively induced cooling to limit infarct size after PCI in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

The aim of this study was to assess early induction of mild hypothermia using a novel noninvasive thermoregulatory system as adjunctive therapy in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Back to Article Outline

Methods 

Study population and design 

From March 2003 to September 2003, patients were enrolled in this feasibility and safety study of noninvasive surface cooling with the Arctic Sun Temperature Management System (Medivance Inc, Louisville, Colo) as adjunctive therapy in patients with an acute STEMI eligible for primary PCI. All patients presented to the Montreal Heart Institute's emergency department with chest pain compatible with ischemic pain of at least 30 minutes duration and within 6 hours of onset. The initial electrocardiographic evaluation had to show either 2-mm ST elevation in 2 consecutive anterior leads or 1-mm ST elevation in 2 consecutive inferior leads.

Exclusion criteria for the study were patients with history of previous myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock or Killip class ≥II at the time of presentation; need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation; complete bundle branch block, ventricular paced rhythm, or atrial fibrillation on the initial ECG; any contraindication to PCI or standard medications used in conventional PCI (eg, aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, direct antithrombin inhibitors, and glycoprotein receptor inhibitors); active bleeding; a history of Raynaud disease; history of clinically significant neutropenia (<1000 neutrophils/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (<100000 platelets/mm3); major surgery or trauma within the preceding 6 weeks; nonmenopausal female patients; weight ≥114 kg (250 lb); and finally, patients who were unable or unwilling (written informed consent) to comply with the protocol.

Noninvasive thermoregulatory system 

The Medivance Arctic Sun Model 2000 is a thermoregulatory feedback system that controls and monitors patient temperature within a range of 33°C to 37°C (Figure 1). This system has been used to induce mild hypothermia in healthy volunteers,7, 8 to induce mild hypothermia in cardiac arrest patients,9 and to control refractory neurogenic fever.10 The Arctic Sun Control Module incorporates a temperature control algorithm that responds to patient temperature by circulating temperature-controlled water through the Arctic Sun Energy Transfer Pads to achieve a preset target. The Energy Transfer Pads are coated with a water-based biocompatible adhesive hydrogel material, which provides close skin contact for efficient heat exchange from the water to the patient.

Hypothermia protocol 

The pads were placed on the patient's back, abdomen, and thighs in the emergency department with a target temperature set at 34.5°C. Before cooling, an initial dose of meperidine 0.4 mg/kg was administered intravenously (IV) for 5 minutes to provide patient comfort and to prevent shivering for the first 5 patients. In subsequent patients, the initial meperidine dose was increased to 50 mg. Ondansetron 8 mg was administered IV for 5 minutes to minimize nausea associated with meperidine injection. Additional doses of meperidine 25 to 50 mg IV bolus were administered as needed for shivering, provided the patient was alert and arousable. At all times, patients were monitored for level of consciousness, tolerance to hypothermia, and respiratory depression; the next day, they were interviewed on their recollection of their discomfort related to cooling. Oxygen saturation was monitored continuously, and arterial blood gases were drawn according to the alertness of the patient.

Induced hypothermia was to be stopped for any of the following reasons: change in vital signs from steady state lasting >10 minutes, persistent arrhythmias unrelated to the PCI procedure, or persistent shivering despite medication or temperature modulation.

After 3 hours at target, patients were rewarmed to 36.5° for 2 hours, after which, the therapy was terminated.

Percutaneous coronary intervention 

Primary angioplasty and coronary stenting were performed using conventional equipment according to current standards of practice. Aspirin and IV heparin were administered to all study patients before cardiac catheterization. Use of glycoprotein receptor inhibitors was left to the operator's discretion. If the latter were used, activated clotting times of 200 to 250 seconds were selected; otherwise, a range of 250 to 350 seconds was deemed appropriate.

Evaluation of myocardial reperfusion and infarct size 

Lesion morphology was classified according to the modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification.11 Angiographic evaluation of TIMI flow grade and myocardial perfusion grade were analyzed as previously published.12, 13 Myoview myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging was used to assess infarct size within 30 days from admission.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Eleven patients were enrolled during the study period. All patients underwent cooling induction in the emergency department after a tentative STEMI diagnosis. However, cooling was discontinued in 2 patients: 1 had a critical left main disease and was sent for urgent CABG, whereas the other had angiographically normal coronaries and was later diagnosed with a preexcitation syndrome and asymmetric septal hypertrophy. No hypothermia-related adverse clinical event was reported. The remaining 9 patients had an angiographically documented infarct-related artery amenable to PCI (baseline characteristics shown in Table I). All study patients were Killip class I on enrollment. All primary stenting for STEMI were procedural successes, achieving TIMI grade 3 flow within an hour of cooling induction. A glycoprotein inhibitor was administered in 6 of the 9 patients.

Table I. Clinical and angiographic data
Mild hypothermia treatment patients (n = 11)
Baseline characteristics
Age (y, SD)62 ± 11
Sex (M/F)10/11
Mean weight (kg)77
Hypertension4
Diabetes mellitus0
Dyslipidemia6
Smoker6
Infarct-related artery
Left anterior descending3
Left circumflex1
Right coronary5
Extent of diseased vessels
1-Vessel6
2-Vessel1
3-Vessel3
Stent deployment9
Glycoprotein inhibitors6
LVEF (mean, %)45
Angiographic data
Initial TIMI flow grade
07
10
21
31
Lesion complexity
(Modified AHA class C)9
Final TIMI flow grade 39
Final TMP grade 33

LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; AHA, American Heart Association; TMP, TIMI perfusion.

Angiographic data of patients with severe left main disease and preexcitation syndrome were not included.

Mild hypothermia was successfully achieved in all patients with a mean time to the target of 34.5°C of 79 minutes, with a range of 40 to 176 minutes (35°C was achieved in 61 minutes). Performance improved with each patient enrolled (Table II). The key factor in rapid consistent cooling was managing the initial dose of meperidine, which was eventually increased to 1 mg/kg bolus: a maximum of 75 mg administered before active cooling and subsequent boluses of meperidine being given to avoid shivering during the course of the treatment. Microshivering was recognized by change in cooling rate monitored by the Arctic Sun and was managed with meperidine, bringing a more efficient temperature control. This improvement helped the last 4 patients to reach the target of 34.5°C in a mean time of 46 minutes (Figure 2). No delay from arrival to the emergency department to the catheterization for primary PCI occurred. The average duration time of mild hypothermia was 267 minutes. Only 1 patient presented an episode of ventricular tachycardia at stent implantation upon restoration of TIMI 3 flow requiring electric cardioversion, which was not hampered by the cooling therapy. No other significant arrhythmia occurred throughout the immediate post-PCI period or during the remainder of the hospitalization. In addition, no electrolyte disturbance or coagulopathy were documented.

Table II. Mild therapeutic hypothermia (minutes)
Mean hypothermia times (min)
Chest pain to emergency department110
Emergency department to cooling induction39
Cooling induction to target 34.5°C79
Cooling induction to target 34.5°C in last 4 included patients46
Cooling induction to TIMI grade 3 flow38
Cooling, total duration267

Mean meperidine dose (mg/kg per hour) = 1.04 (shivering controlled in 8/9 patients) (excluding 1 shivering noncontrolled patient).

Shivering was well controlled in 8 patients with a mean dose of meperidine of 1.04 mg/kg per hour over the course of the study. However, shivering was not controlled in 1 patient even with a meperidine dose of 1.26 mg/kg per hour. No respiratory depression was encountered. In 4 patients, concomitant medications including Versed, fentanyl, or morphine were required for additional sedation. A loss of verbal communication without respiratory depression occurred in these patients and was reestablished with a single dose of IV Narcan 0.2 mg. Although Narcan reversed the sedative effects of meperidine, the antishivering effects were not reversed and cooling continued without further change in the level of consciousness or incident. Verbal contact at any time has confirmed the adequate tolerance to the mild hypothermia in all patients but one (uncontrolled shivering). As stated earlier, patients who needed Narcan to recuperate the verbal contact have maintained the shivering protection and comfort from the meperidine. Postprocedure interviews revealed a positive patient perception in all cases.

All patients achieved TIMI grade 3 flow after PCI (Figure 3). Initial TIMI perfusion grade (TMPG) in all 9 patients was TMPG 0/1. After reperfusion therapy, assessment of myocardial reperfusion revealed TMPG 3 in 3 cases, no case of TMPG 2, and 6 cases that remained at TMPG 0/1. Infarct size as assessed by Myoview SPECT scans showed an average size of 23%. In addition, using SPECT imaging, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 45%.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

Myocardial infarction remains an important clinical entity for which thrombolytic or mechanical strategies have been proven efficacious. Recent trends have shifted focus from upstream to downstream reperfusion, and prevention of myocardial damage from ischemia reperfusion injury has become as important a goal as epicardial patency.14

Experimental models on the role of myocardial temperature and its association with tissue necrosis and infarct size extension have opened the door to new therapeutic modalities.15 Even when instituted after onset of ischemia, Hale et al5 have shown benefits from regional hypothermia in rabbit hearts; a reduction of myocardial temperature by 3.6°C resulted in a 65% reduction in infarct size.5, 16 The same group has also shown that this effect is independent of hypothermia-induced bradycardia.4 Myocardial protection afforded by mild to moderate hypothermia is achieved mainly by reduced metabolic demand, which preserves mitochondrial function and spares ATP stores during reperfusion.17

In clinical studies, induced hypothermia has resulted in favorable outcomes when used as adjunctive neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest without any untoward effect such as cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, or sepsis.18

The COOL-MI trial was a multicenter study, which randomized 357 patients within 6 hours of their AMI onset to primary PCI with or without cooling. An invasive endovascular cooling system set up in the catheterization laboratory was used to successfully induce mild hypothermia during PCI for STEMI.6 Hypothermia was thus initiated close to first balloon inflation. Although well tolerated and safe, this means cooling did not result in a difference in infarct size between the hypothermia and control groups (17.9% vs 19.2%, P = .92) except for patients with anterior myocardial infarction who reached a core temperature ≤35°C at the time of reperfusion (n = 16) (infarct size 9.3% vs 18.2%, P = .05).19

The present single-center study assessed the safety and feasibility of noninvasively induced mild hypothermia in the setting of primary PCI in STEMI. The surface cooling by the Medivance Arctic Sun thermoregulatory system was well tolerated and did not result in any hemodynamic instability, cardiac arrhythmia, or other potential hypothermia-related adverse effects. Shivering was also well controlled by meperidine. The relatively high dose of meperidine was well tolerated and safe as previously published, requiring only limited use of Narcan20 related to concomitant use of sedatives. The main advantage to this system is the ease and rapidity of noninvasive hypothermia induction, which can be readily positioned in the emergency department immediately after patient evaluation. In tertiary centers, “no-delay” direct PCI will be the treatment of choice for AMI, and the cooling, to be beneficial, will need to be fast, faster than the time to initiate reperfusion and may be achieved with improved endovascular techniques. In the current context of patient referral to tertiary PCI-capable centers in the setting of STEMI, it would be also possible to initiate noninvasive hypothermia during transfer, thus extending myocardial protection before reperfusion. Such studies are ongoing with a new portable system.

Conclusion 

In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, mild hypothermia can be safely induced with noninvasive surface cooling technology, allowing the potential for earlier myocardial protection before mechanical reperfusion therapy.

Study limitations 

The present study was a feasibility trial. Potential limitations of the study remain to be the small patient population and the lack of control group. Nevertheless, the clinical and angiographic data show that this noninvasive cooling system can be safely and effectively incorporated as adjunctive therapy to primary PCI in the setting of STEMI. Further randomized studies are required to confirm the applicability and efficacy of this device to a broader range of patients.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Grines CL, Serruys P, O'Neill WW. Fibrinolytic therapy: is it a treatment of the past?. Circulation. 2003;107:2538–2542
  2. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20
  3. Bernard SA, Buist M. Induced hypothermia in critical care medicine: a review. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2041–2051
  4. Hale SL, Kloner RA. Myocardial temperature in acute myocardial infarction: protection with mild regional hypothermia. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H220–H227
  5. Hale SL, Dave RH, Kloner RA. Regional hypothermia reduces myocardial necrosis even when instituted after the onset of ischemia. Basic Res Cardiol. 1997;92:351–357
  6. Dixon SR, Whitbourn RJ, Dae MW, et al. Induction of mild systemic hypothermia with endovascular cooling during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1928–1934
  7. Zweifler RM, Voorhees ME, Mahmood MA, et al. Induction and maintenance of mild hypothermia by surface cooling in non-intubated subjects. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;12:237–243
  8. Zweifler RM, Voorhees ME, Mahmood MA, et al. Magnesium sulfate increases the rate of hypothermia via surface cooling and improves comfort. Stroke. 2004;35:2331–2334
  9. El-Feky WH, Baird RW, Baldridge S, et al. Establishing a mild hypothermia induction protocol for patients following cardiac arrest using conventional cooling blankets and the Artic Sun 2000 cooling system. Neurocritical Care. 2004;1:261–262
  10. Carhuapoma JR, Gupta K, Coplin WM, et al. Treatment of refractory fever in the neurosciences critical care unit using a novel, water-circulating cooling device. A single-center pilot experience. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003;15:313–318
  11. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation. 1990;82:1193–1202
  12. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932–936
  13. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation. 2000;101:125–130
  14. Roe MT, Ohman EM, Maas AC, et al. Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:9–18
  15. Chien GL, Wolff RA, Davis RF, et al. “Normothermic range” temperature affects myocardial infarct size. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:1014–1017
  16. Dave RH, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Hypothermic, closed circuit pericardioperfusion: a potential cardioprotective technique in acute regional ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1667–1671
  17. Ning XH, Chen SH, Xu CS, et al. Hypothermia preserves myocardial function and mitochondrial protein gene expression during hypoxia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H212–H219
  18. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:557–563
  19. O'Neill WW. A prospective randomized trial of mild systemic hypothermia during PCI treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Washington, September 2003.
  20. Koska AJ, Kramer WG, Romagnoli A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose meperidine in surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 1981;60:8–11

PII: S0002-8703(05)00357-1

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.049

American Heart Journal
Volume 150, Issue 5 , Pages 933.e9-933.e13, November 2005