American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 1 , Pages 69-75, January 2006

The impact of ejection fraction on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with congestive heart failure: An analysis of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry and Dynamic Registry

  • Elizabeth M. Holper, MD, MPH, FACC

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Elizabeth M. Holper, MD, MPH, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 6080 Room B601, Chicago, IL 60637.
  • ,
  • John Blair, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Faith Selzer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Katherine M. Detre, MD, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • David O. Williams, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
  • ,
  • Helen Vlachos, MS

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Robert L. Wilensky, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Paul Coady, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood, PA
  • ,
  • David P. Faxon, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • for the Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry and Dynamic Registry Investigators

Received 2 August 2004; accepted 5 March 2005.

Background

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have higher rates of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A comprehensive analysis of outcomes in patients with CHF in the current era has not been done. We studied the outcomes of patients with CHF who underwent PCI in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–sponsored Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) and Dynamic registries.

Methods

We evaluated demographic and angiographic characteristics and the clinical outcomes of patients with CHF in the Dynamic Registry and the PTCA Registry, excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction. In the Dynamic Registry, patients with CHF (n = 503) were compared with patients without CHF (n = 4194), and patients with CHF with a preserved ejection fraction (EF) (n = 134) were compared with patients with CHF who have a reduced EF (n = 199). The patients with CHF in the 1997 through 2001 Dynamic Registry (n = 236) were then similarly compared with patients with CHF in the earlier PTCA Registry (n = 117).

Results

In the Dynamic Registry, compared with patients without CHF, patients with CHF had a higher-risk clinical and angiographic profile, and a higher mortality rate both inhospital (2.6% vs 0.4%, P ≤ .001) and at 1 year (13.1% vs 3.0%, P < .001). Patients with reduced EF had higher inhospital mortality rates and a trend toward higher mortality at 1 year. The patients with CHF in the Dynamic Registry compared with those in the PTCA Registry had a higher risk profile yet had significantly higher procedural success rates and improved clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Although CHF remains a strong predictor of adverse outcomes after PCI, significant improvement seen in the past decade is likely related to improved procedural techniques and improved medical therapy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by grants HL-33292-14 and HL-033292-18 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md.

PII: S0002-8703(05)00355-8

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.053

American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 1 , Pages 69-75, January 2006