American Heart Journal
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 243-250, August 2005

Candidate gene susceptibility variants predict intermediate end points but not angiographic coronary artery disease

  • Bryant M. Whiting, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, LDS Hospital Cardiovascular Department, 8th Avenue and C Street Salt Lake City, UT 84143.
  • ,
  • Joseph B. Muhlestein, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • Benjamin D. Horne, MStat MPH

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • Tami L. Bair, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • Robert R. Pearson, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • John F. Carlquist, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • for the Intermountain Heart Collaborative (IHC) Study Group.

Received 14 November 2003; accepted 17 August 2004.

Background

Moderate-sized studies have suggested that variants of candidate genes can influence laboratory markers of coronary artery disease (CAD), but whether they predict parallel changes in clinical CAD risk is unknown.

Methods

We studied a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) from each of the 5 candidate genes for intermediate (laboratory) and clinical (angiographic CAD) end points in a large cohort of patients. The 5 gene SNPs were cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) TaqIB (N = 3219), ATP-binding cassette (ABCA1) G596A (N = 3302), lipoprotein lipase (LPL) HindIII (N = 909), plasminogen activator inhibitor, type 1 (PAI1), 4G/5G (N = 1142), and hepatic lipase (HL) C-541T (N = 4704). Intermediate outcomes were high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TGs). Cases had 1- to 3-vessel CAD (≥70% stenosis); controls had angiographically normal coronaries.

Results

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein predicted HDL (mean, B1B1 35.0 mg/dL, B2B2 38.6 mg/dL; P < .001) but not CAD (B1B1 74%, B2B2 70%; adjusted P = .35, odds ratio [OR] = 0.89). ABCA1 predicted HDL (mean, GG = 36.4 mg/dL, AA = 39.2 mg/dL; P = .02) but not CAD (GG 74%, AA 75%; adjusted P = .96, OR = 0.99). HL predicted HDL (CC 37.1 mg/dL, TT 40.9 mg/dL; P = .002) but not CAD (CC 71%, TT 68%, adjusted P = .66, OR = 0.94). LPL predicted TG (median: [++] 134, [−−] 98 mg/dL; P < .001) but not CAD ([++] 79%, [−−] 79%; adjusted P = .99, OR = 1.00). PAI1 predicted TG (median, 4G4G 130 mg/dL, 5G5G 148 mg/dL; P = .16), but not CAD (4G4G 77%, 5G5G 76%; adjusted P = .62, OR = 1.11).

Conclusions

Five SNPs predicted differences in risk-related lipids but not angiographic CAD. These discrepancies suggest that genetic determinants of CAD are complex and intermediate phenotypes are poor surrogates. These findings have important implications for future directions in genetic research.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Deseret Foundation, Salt Lake City, Utah, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant 1 R01 4L071878-01A2.

PII: S0002-8703(04)00595-2

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.08.034

American Heart Journal
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 243-250, August 2005