American Heart Journal
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 234-239, February 2005

Comparison of ezetimibe plus simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolemia:

Design and rationale of the Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolemia Enhances Atherosclerosis Regression (ENHANCE) trial

  • John J.P. Kastelein, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: John J.P. Kastelein, MD, PhD, Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Philip T. Sager, MD

      Affiliations

    • Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ
  • ,
  • Eric de Groot, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Enrico Veltri, MD

      Affiliations

    • Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ

Received 28 January 2004; accepted 29 June 2004.

Background

Lipid lowering through statin therapy significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. The ENHANCE study is an international 2-year, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that treatment of hypercholesterolemia by use of 2 complementary agents, ezetimibe (a specific cholesterol absorption inhibitor) and simvastatin (a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor), will result in larger beneficial effects on carotid artery intima-media thickness (CA IMT) than simvastatin monotherapy.

Methods

The study will recruit 725 men and women with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. After a placebo washout period, participants are randomized to receive daily administration of either simvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg or simvastatin 80 mg and placebo. The ENHANCE trial uses novel state-of-the-art single-frame digital image acquisition and rigorous quality assurance and control.

Results

The primary end point is mean change from baseline to 2 years in CA IMT, using composite measures from the right and left far wall common carotid artery, carotid bulb, and internal carotid artery. Secondary end points include (1) the proportion of participants who exhibit reductions in CA IMT, (2) the change in maximum far wall IMT, (3) the proportion of participants who develop new carotid artery plaques, and (4) the changes in carotid plus common femoral artery IMT.

Conclusions

This study addresses the question of whether a regimen that uses drugs with different mechanisms of action will be of further benefit in terms of atherosclerosis reduction compared to statin monotherapy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(04)00550-2

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.024

American Heart Journal
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 234-239, February 2005