American Heart Journal
Volume 148, Issue 5 , Pages 764-775, November 2004

Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: Study design and rationale

  • Gregg W. Stone, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Gregg W. Stone, MD, The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 55 E 59th St, 6th Floor, New York City, New York 10022, USA.
  • ,
  • Michel Bertrand, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Antonio Colombo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • George Dangas, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Michael E. Farkouh, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Frederick Feit, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Alexandra J. Lansky, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • A.Michael Lincoff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Roxana Mehran, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey W. Moses, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Magnus Ohman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Harvey D. White, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA

Received 25 January 2004; accepted 27 April 2004.

Abstract 

Background

Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS; unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) are at significant risk for death and myocardial infarction. Early angiography followed by revascularization is considered the treatment of choice for moderate- to high-risk patients with ACS. However, despite the integration of newer therapies including stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and thienopyridines, the rate of adverse ischemic events still remains unacceptably high, and the intensive pharmacologic regimens used to stabilize the disrupted atherosclerotic plaque and support angioplasty and surgical revascularization procedures elicit a high rate of bleeding complications. Pilot trials suggest that the thrombin-specific anticoagulant bivalirudin may improve clinical outcomes in ACS.

Study design

In the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial, 13,800 patients with moderate- to high-risk ACS are being prospectively randomly assigned at up to 600 centers to unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + provisional IIb/IIIa inhibition. All patients undergo cardiac catheterization within 72 hours, followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization when appropriate. In a second random assignment, patients assigned to receive IIb/IIIa inhibitors are subrandomized to upstream drug initiation, versus IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration during angioplasty only. The primary study end point is the composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization for ischemia, and major bleeding at 30 days. Clinical follow-up will continue for 1 year.

Conclusions

The ACUITY trial is the largest study yet performed in patients with ACS undergoing an invasive strategy. In addition to evaluating the utility of bivalirudin in ACS, this study will also provide important guidance regarding the necessity for and timing of IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(04)00281-9

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.036

American Heart Journal
Volume 148, Issue 5 , Pages 764-775, November 2004