« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 148, Issue 1
, Pages 27-33
, July 2004
Symptoms in acute coronary syndromes: does sex make a difference?
References
-
Society for Women's Health Research. Available at: http://www.womancando.org/conditions/whatclaimslives.htm. Accessed October 15, 2002
- Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry). Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:9–14
-
.
Cardiovascular health and disease in women.
N Engl J Med. 1993;324:247–256
- Women and coronary disease (relationship between descriptors of signs and symptoms and diagnostic and treatment course). Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:175–182
- . The Yentl syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:274–276
- Sex based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:217–225
- . Women's risk of decision delay in acute myocardial infarction (implications for research and practice). AACN Clin Issues. 2001;12:29–39
- . Response of physicians to medical complaints in men and women. JAMA. 1979;241:2186–2187
- Sex differences in symptom presentation associated with acute myocardial infarction (a population based perspective). Am Heart J. 1998;136:189–195
-
Ashton KC. How men and women with heart disease seek care: the delay experience. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs 1999;Spring:53–60
- Age and sex differences in presentation of symptoms among patients with acute coronary disease (the REACT trial). Coron Artery Dis. 2000;11:399–407
- Gender differences in symptom presentation associated with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:396–399
- Typical symptoms are predictive of acute coronary syndromes in women. Am Heart J. 2002;143:283–288
- Presentation of acute myocardial infarction in men and women. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:79–87
- Localization of pain in suspected acute myocardial infarction in relation to final diagnosis, age and sex, and site and type of infarction. Heart Lung. 1996;25:430–437
- . Gender differences in reported symptoms for acute myocardial infarction (impact of prehospital delay time interval). Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:363–366
- The effect of gender on the probability of myocardial infarction among emergency department patients with acute chest pain. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:392–398
-
Unexplained gender differences in clinical symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.
J Am Coll Card. 1993;21:238A
- . Acute myocardial infarction (difference in the treatment between men and women). Qual Assur Health Care. 1993;5:261–265
- . Comparison of reported symptoms of acute myocardial infarction in Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites (the Corpus Christi Heart Project). Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1329–1332
-
Albarren J, Durham B, Gowers J, et al. Is the radiation of chest pain a useful indicator of myocardial infarction? A prospective study of 541 patients. Accid Emerg Nurs 2002;Jan 10(1):2–9
- Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1999;353:89–92
- Reasons patients with chest pain delay or do not call 911. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:193–197
-
.
Treatment of women with acute MI (new findings from the MITI registry).
J Myocard Ischemia. 1992;4:27–37
- Effect of gender on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:1466–1469
-
Gender analysis of symptoms in acute coronary syndromes.
Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:540–541
- . Challenging the rules (women's prodromal and acute symptoms of myocardial infarction). Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:135–146
- Utilization of emergency medical services for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 1995;24:11–18
- . Beyond sociodemographics (factors influencing the decision to seek treatment for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction). Heart Lung. 1997;26:253–262
-
Root MJ. Communication barriers between older women and physicians. Women and their health care providers; a matter of communication. Pub Health Rep Suppl 1989;July-August:152–5
- . Gender, cardiology and optimal medical care. Circulation. 1986;74:917–919
☆ Supported in part by the Vardalinstitute research platform.
PII: S0002-8703(04)00127-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.005
© 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 148, Issue 1
, Pages 27-33
, July 2004
