American Heart Journal
Volume 148, Issue 1 , Pages 34-40, July 2004

Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease: biological mechanisms, observational epidemiology, and the need for randomized trials

  • Adam Splaver, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology Research, Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Miami School of Medicine Miami Beach, FlaUSA
  • ,
  • Gervasio A Lamas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology Research, Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Miami School of Medicine Miami Beach, FlaUSA
    • Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FlaUSA
  • ,
  • Charles H Hennekens, MD, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FlaUSA
    • Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FlaUSA
    • Agatston Research Institute (ARI), Miami Beach, FlaUSA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Charles H. Hennekens, 2800 S Ocean Blvd, PH-A, Boca Raton, FL 33432, USA.

Received 14 August 2003; accepted 10 January 2004.

Abstract 

Basic research indicates that homocysteine causes endothelial dysfunction and damage, accelerates thrombin formation, inhibits native thrombolysis, promotes lipid peroxidation through free radical formation, and induces vascular smooth muscle proliferation and monocyte chemotaxis. Most, but not all, observational epidemiological studies indicate that individuals with higher homocysteine levels have increased risks of cardiovascular disease. The magnitude ranges from approximately 20% in prospective studies to approximately 80% in retrospective case-control studies. In all observational epidemiological studies, however, the amount of uncontrolled and uncontrollable confounding is as large as the postulated small to moderate effect size. Thus, the totality of evidence should include randomized trials of sufficient sample size and duration with clinical end points. Folic acid reduces levels of homocysteine, but at present, despite several plausible biological mechanisms and a large body of observational epidemiological data, it is unclear whether supplementation will reduce risks of cardiovascular disease. It is also unclear whether any benefit of folic acid is attributable to lowering homocysteine levels. The current evidence is necessary, but not sufficient to judge causality. Such judgments await the availability of data from large-scale randomized trials. The availability of such data would permit rational clinical decision-making for individual patients and policy decisions for the health of the general public.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(04)00094-8

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.004

American Heart Journal
Volume 148, Issue 1 , Pages 34-40, July 2004