« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 146, Issue 5
, Pages 754-756
, November 2003
New insight into clinical risk scores for patients with acute coronary syndromes
References
- ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article (a report of the ACC/AHA task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina)). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1366–1374
-
Braunwald E, Mark D, Jones R, et al. Unstable angina: diagnosis and management. Clinical practice guideline number 10. AHCPR publication no. 94-0602. Rockville (Md): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the NHLBI, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994:154
- Prognosis in the thrombolysis in myocardial ischemia III registry according to the Braunwald unstable angina pectoris classification. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:821–826
-
PREDICT (A simple risk score for clinical severity and long-term prognosis after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina: the Minnesota heart survey).
Circulation. 1999;100:599–607
-
Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation (results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators).
Circulation. 2000;101:2557–2567
- The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI (A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making). JAMA. 2000;284:835–842
-
Brilakis ES, Wright RS, Kopecky SL, et al. Association of the PURSUIT risk score with predischarge ejection fraction, angiographic severity of coronary artery disease, and mortality in a nonselected, community-based population with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2003;146:811–8
- . Prediction scores after myocardial infarction (value, limitations, and future directions). Circulation. 2002;106:2292–2293
- . The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36
- Clinical risk stratification correlates with the angiographic extent of coronary artery disease in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2053–2058
-
Higher TIMI Risk Score is associated with coronary thrombus and abnormal flow in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (observations from PRISM-PLUS).
[abstract]
Circulation. 2001;104:II-648
-
An integrated clinical approach to predicting the benefit of tirofiban in non-ST eleva-tion acute coronary syndromes.
Application of the TIMI Risk Score for UA/NSTEMI in PRISM-PLUS. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:223–229
- Scores for post-myocardial infarction risk stratification in the community. Circulation. 2002;106:2309–2314
- . Evidence-based risk stratification to target therapies in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002;106:1588–1591
- Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1879–1887
-
.
Critical pathway for unstable angina.
In:
Cannon CP, O'Gara PT editor. Critical pathways in cardiology. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001;p. 131–141
- Impact of a clinical decision rule on hospital triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. JAMA. 2002;288:342–350
-
TIMI Risk Score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation. An InTIME II substudy).
Circulation. 2000;102:2031–2037
- Geographic variation in patient and hospital characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolysis (results from InTIME-II). Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1702–1715
-
Implications of upstream GPIIB/IIIA inhibition and stenting in the invasive management of UA/NSTEMI (a comparison of TIMI IIIB and TACTICS-TIMI 18).
[abstract]
Circulation. 2001;104:II-549
-
Comparing AMI mortality among hospitals in patients 65 years of age and older (evaluating methods of risk adjustment).
Circulation. 1999;99:2986–2992
PII: S0002-8703(03)00460-5
doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00460-5
© 2003 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Heart Journal
Volume 146, Issue 5
, Pages 754-756
, November 2003
