American Heart Journal
Volume 146, Issue 5 , Pages 797-803, November 2003

A modified Anderson-Wilkins electrocardiographic acuteness score for anterior or inferior myocardial infarction1

  • Bo Hedén, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Rasmus Ripa, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NCUSA
  • ,
  • Eva Persson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Qianzi Song, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NCUSA
  • ,
  • Charles Maynard, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington, Department of Health Services, Seattle, Wash, USA
  • ,
  • Paul Leibrandt, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NCUSA
  • ,
  • Thomas Wall, MD

      Affiliations

    • LeBauer Research group, Moses Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Timothy F Christian, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn, USA
  • ,
  • Stephen C Hammill, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn, USA
  • ,
  • Samuel S Bell, BEnvd

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NCUSA
  • ,
  • Olle Pahlm, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Galen S Wagner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NCUSA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Galen S. Wagner, MD, Duke University Medical Center, 2400 Pratt St, Rm 0306, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

Received 5 November 2002; accepted 23 April 2003.

Abstract 

Background

Optimal treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) depends on the duration of the ischemia. The Anderson Wilkins (AW) electrocardiographic acuteness score has been shown to complement the historical timing in estimating the time interval from acute thrombotic coronary occlusion in patients presenting with chest pain and evolving myocardial infarction. The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the distributions of the previously developed AW acuteness score in a training population with either anterior or inferior AMI and (2) propose modifications to the formula to achieve distributions similar to the observed distributions of historical times from onset of pain.

Methods

Two hundred three and 177 patients were included as training and testing population, respectively. All patients had an anterior or an inferior AMI and were without confounding factors on the electrocardiogram.

Results

The training population had similar distributions of historical times from onset of pain, but differences in distributions of AW acuteness scores, between patients with anterior and inferior AMI (P < .0001). Eighty percent of the inferior AMI group had the highest possible AW acuteness score. Modification of a Q-wave criterion from ≥30 to ≥20 ms resulted in similar distributions in patients with anterior and inferior AMI both in the training and an independent testing population.

Conclusions

These results suggest that a modified AW acuteness score using a lower Q-wave duration criterion provides similar AMI timing information in patients with anterior and inferior locations. Clinical use of the AW acuteness score will only be practical if the calculation is automated.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • 1 Guest Editor for this manuscript was Melvin D. Cheitlin, MD, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, Calif.

 This study was supported by grants from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.

PII: S0002-8703(03)00404-6

doi:10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00404-6

American Heart Journal
Volume 146, Issue 5 , Pages 797-803, November 2003