American Heart Journal
Volume 146, Issue 5 , Pages 775-786, November 2003

Intracoronary brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization

  • Richard Sheppard, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Mark J Eisenberg, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mark J Eisenberg, MD, MPH, Associate Professor of Medicine, Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, 3755 Cote St. Catherine Road/Suite A-118, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada.
  • ,
  • David Donath, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hopital Université de Montréal, Hopital Notre Dame, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • David Meerkin, MB, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Intervention Laboratories, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Received 20 September 2002; accepted 21 March 2003.

Abstract 

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to review the current literature pertaining to intracoronary brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR).

Methods

English-language articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (January 1984 to January 2003) using the keywords brachytherapy, radioactive stents, and coronary arteries. In addition, pertinent reference citations from relevant articles were reviewed.

Results

Restenosis after PCR is a complex process, thought to be due to a combination of vessel wall remodeling and neointimal proliferation. To date, catheter-based delivery of intracoronary brachytherapy has been found to prevent vessel wall remodeling and causes a reduction in the proliferation of the neointima. Neointimal proliferation, as measured by mean neointimal area, was reduced in all animal studies (range 26%–91%). In contrast, animal studies examining radioactive stents demonstrated an increase in neointimal proliferation, suggesting that they may not be helpful at preventing post-PCR restenosis. All human studies using catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis have employed either β (beta) or γ (gamma) radiation sources with variable doses of radiation (range 7–56 Grays [Gy]). Restenosis occurred in 12% to 40% of patients in nonrandomized studies, and clinical events occurred in 13% to 50% of patients. To date, there have been 7 published randomized trials in humans comparing catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy to placebo, with a total of 1047 patients. The dose of radiation in the trials ranged from 14 Gy to 30 Gy. During follow-up, 8% to 33% of patients who received brachytherapy had restenosis versus 39% to 64% of patients receiving placebo. Clinical events occurred in 19% to 50% among patients who received brachytherapy versus 29% to 79% among patients receiving placebo. The majority of human studies examining radioactive stents do not demonstrate a reduction in restenosis in patients post-PCR. There are no randomized trials examining radioactive stents in humans.

Conclusion

Nonrandomized studies of radioactive stents suggest they are not effective at preventing in-stent restenosis. In contrast, data from animal and human studies suggest that catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy can prevent in-stent restenosis and reduce clinical events post-PCR.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-8703(03)00389-2

doi:10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00389-2

American Heart Journal
Volume 146, Issue 5 , Pages 775-786, November 2003