American Heart Journal
Volume 145, Issue 6 , Pages 979-985 , June 2003

Feedback intervention to reduce routine electrocardiogram use in primary care

  • Randall S Stafford, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Primary Care Operations Improvement Team, Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA
    • Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif., USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Randall S. Stafford, MD, PhD, Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, 1000 Welch Rd, Palo Alto CA 94304, USA.

Received 10 April 2002 ,Accepted 12 July 2002.

References 

  1. Fye W. A history of the origin, evolution, and impact of electrocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:937–949
  2. Schappert S. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 summary: advance data from Vital and Health Statistics. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1994;
  3. Health Care Financing Administration . Physician fee schedule payment amount file national. Baltimore, Md: HCFA; 2000;
  4. Estes EH. The baseline screening electrocardiogram (is it worthwhile? An opposing view). J Fam Pract. 1987;25:395–396
  5. Norell M, Lythall D, Coghlan G, et al.  Limited value of the resting electrocardiogram in assessing patients with recent onset chest pain (lessons from a chest pain clinic). Br Heart J. 1992;67:53–56
  6. Sox HJ, Garber A, Littenberg B. The resting electrocardiogram as a screening test (a clinical analysis). Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:489–502
  7. US Preventive Services Task Force . Guide to clinical preventive services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1996;
  8. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination . The periodic health examination (1984 update). Can Med Assoc J. 1984;130:2–15
  9. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association . Guidelines for electrocardiography (a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force of the Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Electrocardiography)). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:473–481
  10. Eddy D, editor. Common screening tests. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1991
  11. Green L, Kreuter M. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach. 2nd ed. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1991;
  12. Cabana M, Rand C, Powe N, et al.  Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–1465
  13. Solomon D, Hashimoto H, Daltroy L, Liang MH. Techniques to improve physicians’ use of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1998;280:2020–2027
  14. Eisenberg J. Physician utilization (the state of research about physicians’ practice patterns). Med Care. 1985;23:461–483
  15. Fowkes F, Hall R, Jones J, et al.  Trial of a strategy for reducing the use of laboratory tests. Br Med J. 1986;292:883–885
  16. Dowling P, Alfansi G, Grown M, Culpepper L. An education program to reduce unnecessary laboratory tests by residents. Acad Med. 1989;64:410–412
  17. Stafford RS. Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates. JAMA. 1990;263:683–687
  18. Smith W. Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques to change physician behavior. Chest. 2000;118(2 Suppl):8S–17S
  19. Bareford D, Hayling A. Inappropriate use of laboratory services (long term combined approach to modify request patterns). BMJ. 1990;301:1305–1307
  20. Axt-Adam P, van der Wouden J, van der Does E. Influencing behavior of physicians ordering laboratory tests (a literature study). Med Care. 1993;31:784–794
  21. Sherman H. Surveillance effects on community physician test ordering. Med Care. 1984;22:80–83
  22. Physicians’ current procedural terminology (CPT 98). 4th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1997;
  23. International classification of disease. 9th revision, clinical modification. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1988;
  24. Schnipper JM, Stafford RS. Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: lipid management as a priority for improvement. JCOM 2002;9:371–80
  25. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981;
  26. SAS Institute . SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1994;
  27. Eisenberg J. Doctors’ decisions and the cost of medical care. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1986;

☆ Supported by a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (Bethesda, Md) Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award (K08-HL03548), the Massachusetts General Hospital Primary Care Operations Improvement Initiative (Boston, Mass), and the Donald W. Reynolds Center for Cardiovascular Disease at Stanford University (Palo Alto, Calif).

PII: S0002-8703(03)00107-8

doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00107-8

American Heart Journal
Volume 145, Issue 6 , Pages 979-985 , June 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution