American Heart Journal
Volume 143, Issue 5 , Pages 802-807, May 2002

Large brachial artery diameter is associated with angiographic coronary artery disease in women☆☆

Pittsburgh, Pa, Boston, Mass, Gainesville, Fla, Birmingham, Ala, Providence, RI, Bethesda, Md, and Los Angeles, Calif

From the aDepartment of Epidemiology and the bCardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, the cMolecular Cardiology Research Center, Tufts-New England Medical Center, the dDivision of Cardiology, University of Florida, the eDivision of Cardiology, Allegheny General Health System, the fDivision of Cardiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, the gDivision of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, the hDivision of Heart and Vascular Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the iDivision of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Received 19 June 2001; accepted 12 November 2001.

Abstract 

Background Noninvasive methods are needed for the identification of women at highest risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) who might benefit most from aggressive preventive therapy. Identification of brachial artery atherosclerosis, which correlates with coronary artery atherosclerosis, may be useful to estimate or stratify CAD risk. Because atherosclerosis disrupts the arterial architecture that regulates vessel size, we hypothesized that noninvasively measured large brachial artery diameter is a manifestation of atherosclerosis that is associated with angiographic CAD in women with chest pain. Methods We examined 376 women (mean age, 57.1 years) with chest pain in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation study who underwent B-mode ultrasound scan measurement of brachial artery diameter at rest and during hyperemic stress (to quantify flow-mediated dilation), quantitative coronary angiography, and risk factor assessment. Results Large resting brachial artery diameter was associated with significant angiographic CAD (3.90 ± 0.79 mm vs 3.52 ± 0.59 mm in women with CAD vs no CAD; P < .001). Impaired flow-mediated dilation, which correlated with resting diameter (r = −0.17; P = .001), was weakly associated with significant CAD (2.74% ± 7.11% vs 4.48% ± 9.52% in CAD vs no CAD; P = .046). After adjustment for age, body size, and CAD risk factors, women with large resting brachial artery diameters (>4.1 mm) had 3.6-fold increased odds (95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 7.1; P < .001) of significant angiographic CAD compared with those with small brachial arteries (≤3.6 mm). Conclusion Large resting brachial artery diameter is an independent predictor of significant CAD in women with chest pain. Therefore, a simple ultrasonographic technique may be useful in the identification of women with chest pain who are at increased risk for CAD. (Am Heart J 2002;143:802-7.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts NO1-HV-68161, NO1-HV-68162, NO1-HV-68163, and NO1-HV-68164; National Center for Research Resources GCRC grant M01-RR00425; and grants from the Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, Women's Guild, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Ladies Hospital Aid Society of Western Pennsylvania, and qmed, Inc.

☆☆ Reprint requests: Steven E. Reis, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

 E-mail: reisse@msx.upmc.edu

PII: S0002-8703(02)40743-0

doi:10.1067/mhj.2002.121735

American Heart Journal
Volume 143, Issue 5 , Pages 802-807, May 2002