American Heart Journal
Volume 144, Issue 6 , Pages 981-986, December 2002

European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: How to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials☆☆

Minneapolis and Rochester, Minn, and Hartford, Conn

From the aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minn, the bDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Conn, and the cCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

Received 29 August 2001; accepted 15 February 2002.

Abstract 

Background The European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction suggest that the cutoff value for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) be the 99th percentile of the reference population at a level measured with imprecision (coefficient of variation) ≥10%. No current commercially available troponin assay meets this requirement. Accordingly, questions have been raised about how to implement cutoff values from the guidelines. The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive druG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial asked for recommendations concerning the use of troponin assays for the trial. Methods Cutoff values for the various assays were obtained from package inserts or from direct communication with manufacturers. Results The cutoff value with ≥10% imprecision was above the 99th percentile of the reference range for all assays. For the present, we suggest that this value be used for clinical and clinical trial purposes. It will account for analytic variability and individual biological changes. We provide recommendations for clinical practice and clinical trials concerning how to make the diagnosis of AMI in patients with ischemic symptoms and patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery. Conclusions This is a first attempt to define cutoff values on the basis of the European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines. These criteria will provide increased consistency until assays improve to allow full implementation of the guidelines. (Am Heart J 2002;144981-6.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests: Allan S. Jaffe, MD, 16th Floor, Mayo Building, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

☆☆ E-mail: jaffe.allan@mayo.edu

PII: S0002-8703(02)00221-1

doi:10.1067/mhj.2002.124048

Refers to article:

  • Things ain't what they used to be: Impact of a new definition of myocardial infarction

    Harvey D. White
    American Heart Journal December 2002 (Vol. 144, Issue 6, Pages 933-937)

  • Changing the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: Implications for practice and clinical investigations

    L.Kristin Newby, Joseph S. Alpert, E.Magnus Ohman, Kristian Thygesen, Robert M. Califf
    American Heart Journal December 2002 (Vol. 144, Issue 6, Pages 957-980)

American Heart Journal
Volume 144, Issue 6 , Pages 981-986, December 2002