American Heart Journal
Volume 141, Issue 6 , Pages 908-914, June 2001

Hemodynamics as surrogate end points for survival in advanced heart failure: An analysis from FIRST☆☆

Durham, NC, Chicago, Ill, Dommartin Les Toul, France, Galveston, Tex, and Chapel Hill, NC

FromaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC;bNorthwestern Medical Center, Chicago, Ill;cHopital Jeanne d’Arc, Dommartin Les Toul, France; dUniversity of Texas at Galveston; and ethe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Received 11 August 2000; accepted 16 February 2001.

Abstract 

Background Hemodynamics often are used as surrogate end points in phase II trials of acute heart failure (HF). We reviewed the Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST) database to identify the hemodynamic variables that best predict survival in patients with advanced HF receiving epoprostenol therapy and to determine whether hemodynamics could predict the overall effect of a drug. Methods The trial enrolled 471 patients with class IIIb/IV HF and ejection fraction ≤25% for ≥3 months, all of whom underwent screening pulmonary artery catheter insertion. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either epoprostenol (n = 201) or placebo (n = 235); epoprostenol therapy was guided by pulmonary artery catheter measures, and standard treatment was guided by clinical findings. Multivariable modeling was used to identify and quantify the demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables most associated with 1-year survival. Results In multivariable modeling, HF class, decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and age best predicted 1-year survival. After adjustment for age and HF class, decreased PCWP still significantly predicted survival (hazard ratio, 0.96 for every 1–mm Hg decrease; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 0.99; P = .003). Survival was significantly higher with decreases in PCWP ≥9 versus <9 mm Hg, even after adjustment for age and HF class. Survival of patients in the PCWP ≥9 group was comparable with, and that of the PCWP <9 group was significantly higher than, survival of patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.99; P = .024). Conclusions The reduction in PCWP was the hemodynamic measure most predictive of survival in patients with advanced HF. However, patients with a ≥9–mm Hg decrease had no better survival than patients in the control group, who had limited changes in hemodynamics. Thus, improvement in hemodynamics may not predict the overall effect of a drug. (Am Heart J 2001;141:908-14.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by Glaxo-Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC.

☆☆ Reprint requests: Monica R. Shah, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715. E-mail: shah0013@mc.duke.edu

 Guest Editor for this manuscript was Robert O. Bonow, MD, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill.

PII: S0002-8703(01)70016-6

doi:10.1067/mhj.2001.115299

American Heart Journal
Volume 141, Issue 6 , Pages 908-914, June 2001