American Heart Journal
Volume 141, Issue 6 , Pages 944-948, June 2001

Does the presence of hibernating myocardium in patients with impaired left ventricular contraction affect QT dispersion?

Aberdeen, UK

From athe Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust; and bthe Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Aberdeen University

Received 19 October 2000; accepted 9 February 2001.

Abstract 

Background Hibernating myocardium is associated with increased cardiovascular events. Increased QT dispersion on the surface electrocardiogram is a marker for serious ventricular arrhythmias. In this study, we determine whether hibernating myocardium is associated with increased QT dispersion in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular contraction. Methods Positron emission tomography with 13N-ammonia and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose determined the presence of metabolic-perfusion mismatch defect. QT dispersion was measured by means of a digitizing tablet with validated software. QT intervals were measured on two separate occasions by two investigators blinded to the result of the positron emission tomography scans. Results Forty-two patients with impaired left ventricular contraction were studied. They were divided into two groups: group A was made up of patients with mismatch defects (n = 26) and group B was made up of patients with no mismatch defects (n = 16). The mean (SD) QT dispersion measurements were 61.7 ± 29.8 ms and 70 ± 24.6 ms for groups A and B, respectively (not significant). When the patients were divided according to the dominant viability status of the impaired myocardial segment, a similar result was found. The patients whose impaired myocardium was dominantly hibernating (n = 19) had a mean QT dispersion of 66.4 ± 31.9 ms compared with 63.6 ± 24.8 ms in the patients whose impaired myocardium was mainly scarred (not significant). Conclusions QT dispersion is not affected by the presence of hibernating myocardium and is therefore not clinically useful in identifying patients with this phenomenon. This is in contrast with recent reports by other groups and calls for further investigation of this dichotomy. (Am Heart J 2001;141:944-8.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests: Dr A. Al Mohammad, Specialist Registrar, Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN. E-mail: aammay@hotmail.com

PII: S0002-8703(01)68905-1

doi:10.1067/mhj.2001.114973

American Heart Journal
Volume 141, Issue 6 , Pages 944-948, June 2001