American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 2 , Pages 273-281, February 2006

Are statins created equal? Evidence from randomized trials of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin for cardiovascular disease prevention

  • Zheng Zhou, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    • Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montréal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Elham Rahme, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    • Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montréal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Louise Pilote, MD, MPH, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    • Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montréal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Louise Pilote MD, MPH, PhD, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, L10-421, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1A4.

Received 1 November 2004; accepted 1 April 2005.

Background

The relative efficacy of different statins for long-term cardiovascular prevention remains largely undetermined.

Methods

Using adjusted indirect comparison, we compared 3 statins (pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin) based on published randomized placebo-controlled trials for long-term cardiovascular prevention. A systematic literature search between 1980 and 2004 was conducted. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of the 3 statins, which studied cardiovascular diseases or death as the outcome, enrolled ≥1000 participants, and had ≥1-year follow-up, were included. Trials were grouped according to the statin under study. A pooled relative risk (RR) was derived from each set of trials using a random-effects model. Adjusted indirect comparisons using pooled RRs were made between statins with regard to prespecified clinical outcomes.

Results

Eight placebo-controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, including 4 pravastatin trials (n = 25572), 2 simvastatin trials (n = 24980), and 2 atorvastatin trials (n = 13143). All trials had a similar degree of lipid reduction. Graphical and statistical assessments showed minimal heterogeneity in the trials' effect sizes. Adjusted indirect comparisons did not reveal a statistically significant difference between statins in reducing fatal coronary heart disease and nonfatal myocardial infarctions (simvastatin vs pravastatin: RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.84-1.03]; atorvastatin vs simvastatin: RR 0.84 [95% CI 0.66-1.08]; atorvastatin vs pravastatin: RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.61-1.02]). We were unable to detect differences either in outcomes for fatal and nonfatal strokes, all cardiovascular deaths, and all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

Evidence from published statin randomized placebo-controlled trials suggests that pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin, when used at their standard dosages, show no statistically significant difference in their effect on long-term cardiovascular prevention.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr Zhou was supported by a research scholarship from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and a fellowship from the Canadian Cardiovascular Outcome Research Team (CCORT). Dr Rahme is a research scholar funded by the Arthritis Society. Dr Pilote is a research scholar of the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) and a William Dawson Professor at McGill University. None of the authors has financial interest or conflict with regard to the content discussed in this manuscript.

PII: S0002-8703(05)00361-3

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.003

American Heart Journal
Volume 151, Issue 2 , Pages 273-281, February 2006